Posts that Henrik N is monitoring

Subscribe to Posts that Henrik N is monitoring 39 posts found

Mar 17, 2007
Junk Blocker 23 posts

Topic: Welcome to the new site!

Thank you Henrik. Yes, editable comments would work even better. Removable comments in style of LiveJournal (for when I post while inebriated ;) ) would rock :)

 
Mar 17, 2007
Junk Blocker 23 posts

Topic: Welcome to the new site!

The site needs details of the "Presentation HTML". Also needed is a preview facility to preview comments before posting.

 
Mar 13, 2007
anony 1 post

Topic: Welcome to the new site!

nice site

 
Mar 12, 2007
LS 4 posts

Topic: Welcome to the new site!

Cool. Thanks for the update. I like the new look of the place, btw.

 
Mar 12, 2007
Jesse Andrews 231 posts

Topic: Welcome to the new site!

forums search is now on all the forum pages. Fixing tags will require a little more work.

 
Mar 8, 2007
LS 4 posts

Topic: Welcome to the new site!

The tags seem to be case sensitive. That's a problem... Also, there's only a forum search on the main page. Wee bit silly.

 
Mar 8, 2007
Jesse Andrews 231 posts

Topic: Welcome to the new site!

It should.... sorry about that - adding to a ticket:

adding table, tr, td, th (any others?)

 
Mar 8, 2007
Jonatron 2 posts

Topic: Welcome to the new site!

"Presentational HTML" apparently doesn't mean tables? I have a legitimate use for tables at http://userscripts.org/scripts/show/780

 
Mar 1, 2007
Britt Selvit... 22 posts

Topic: Welcome to the new site!

The new rating system is being revamped, and will be back in soon :)

 
Mar 1, 2007
Balachandar 1 post

Topic: Welcome to the new site!

Hey the new site is cool, but i would like to see the rating system brought back as well as classifying scripts by tagging them.I think the rest is almost perfect :-)

 
Feb 23, 2007
Lior Zur 39 posts

Topic: Welcome to the new site!

Jeremy: have a look at the post about Tags, which basically discusses the same point. Consider also that (a) many scripts can't be pigeonholed that easily, (b) the list of categories might grow very long to be comprehensive enough, (c) you may not be able to determine in advance WHICH categories to create. Anyway, why tags don't fit the bill in your opinion?

 
Feb 23, 2007
Jeremy 1 post

Topic: Welcome to the new site!

I love that you work so hard on that site, and I understand the difficulties you had with tags, but the current configuration makes it difficult to find what I want. I often came to Userscripts.org not looking for anything in particular, just browsing categories and seeing what I could find.

But I do have a suggestion. I am a big user of the networking/bookmarking site StumbleUpon. In StumbleUpon, when you submit a site you must first select a basic preset category from a pull-down menu before you can put in specific tags. If there was a predefined list of categories like "Annoyances", "Download", "Login", people could browse scripts.

 
Feb 22, 2007
peuh-bugmenot 11 posts

Topic: Welcome to the new site!

Many thanks Junk Blocker! *high five*

Good job posting this on the script's page as well, will help the others for sure, :)

 
Feb 20, 2007
Jesse Andrews 231 posts

Topic: search by @include

opened a stub ticket for this ... http://userscripts.devjavu.com/projects/userscr...

 
Feb 19, 2007
Junk Blocker 23 posts

Topic: Welcome to the new site!

peuh, Replace id='menu' with id='nav' on line 20 in that script and you have a system which works (mostly) again (for spending a couple of seconds on this) :).

Further updates:

Around line 108: Comment out var link and var script lines and replace with new script definition as follows and you have the full system working.

// orig var link = document.evaluate("//div[@id='content']/div[@id='name']/a[1]", document, null, XPathResult.UNORDERED_NODE_SNAPSHOT_TYPE, null);

// orig var script = link.snapshotItem(0);

var script = document.evaluate("//div[@id='content']/h1", document, null, XPathResult.UNORDERED_NODE_SNAPSHOT_TYPE, null).snapshotItem(0);

 
Feb 19, 2007
Dana Powers 4 posts

Topic: search by @include

Has a ticket been added for this, or should I go do that? I may have some time and willingness to hack on the code.

 
Feb 19, 2007
peuh-bugmenot 11 posts

Topic: Welcome to the new site!

I see the last updates of the scripts are actually working, which is great since it was annoying when the previous layout would say it was always updated everyday for ever single script.

Hope to see the "Userscripts.org Favorites" script updated so I can see my favorites again, though I assume the script will be useless later on since I heard there will be a favorite scripts section added to the site sometime in the future.

 
Feb 16, 2007
thorbenhauer 8 posts

Topic: Welcome to the new site!

No need to hurry in this issue! There are more important things, I think. And you're doing a great job! It's just a small thing I stepped over exploring the new site. I'm really looking forward to see all the new features going live :)

 
Feb 16, 2007
Britt Selvit... 22 posts

Topic: Welcome to the new site!

thorbenhauer: A lot of those users are spam. We are working at clearing them up as quickly as possible!

 
Feb 16, 2007
thorbenhauer 8 posts

Topic: Welcome to the new site!

Thanks for your explanation Jesse!

 
Feb 15, 2007
Jesse Andrews 231 posts

Topic: Welcome to the new site!

Regarding the Current Status - that was in "beast" the forum software we integrated. You are right that active is just the posting to the board, and isn't accurate since comments, scripts, installs, ... aren't included.

And about the converting of pervious scripts format - perhaps we make a button that converts the markup to html and saves it.

 
Feb 15, 2007
Lior Zur 39 posts

Topic: Welcome to the new site!

To make myself clear: my concern is that the current formatting syntax is broken. I was unaware that there was an alternative way to format descriptions. In fact, I agree with you, Assaf, that presentational HTML is better than the former, non-standard, syntax. I had my share of trouble with it too. If there was a way to automatically convert the former syntax to HTML it would be great. Is there any guide about the HTML tags currently allowed in descriptions?
(P.S. -- "Lior" is my given name, which most people use when we speak.)

 
Feb 15, 2007
thorbenhauer 8 posts

Topic: Welcome to the new site!

Doesn't need a new topic: Current status: 16,595 users, 16 active, 16579 lurking
Seems to me that active users are the ones which posted on the board. Does this make sense? About 0.1% active users look like a dead community. Shouldn't this status be based on script contributions? And maybe in addition comments on scripts and posts?
Just a promotion thingy ;)
 
Feb 14, 2007
Assaf 2 3 posts

Topic: Welcome to the new site!

I disagree with Lior Z.
The support for that kind of text was very poor on this site and had many problems,
we are all developers here, we know our basic HTML, why use other stuff?
In my script I tried to write users can filter a website with adblock and wrote *somewebsite.com* which is the format for adblock filtering with wildcards, this came out as bold and I never really found a way to explain myself.

also I would like to request that you won't bring back those fade-in fade-out login/register which drove me crazy becuase of thier lack of support for firefox's auto-save-password feature.

 
Feb 14, 2007
Jesse Andrews 231 posts

Topic: search by @include

Thirded! We need to visualize what pages are affected by the script on the script show page... including a special "this script runs on all pages!