Would you please...
![]() ![]() |
Would you please use the meta.js routine for script update checking? Use http://userscripts.org/scripts/source/54665.meta.js and @version instead of ...
if (parseInt(GM_getValue("dateMaJ",0))+23*3600< Date.parse(new Date()) / 1000 )
{
GM_xmlhttpRequest(
{
method: 'GET',
url: 'http://userscripts.org/scripts/show/54665',
onload: function(response)
{
var PageUserScript = response.responseText;
var Derniere_Version = trim(PageUserScript.substring(PageUserScript.indexOf('Version:')+15, PageUserScript.indexOf('
', PageUserScript.indexOf('Version:'))));
...
Thanks :) |
![]() ![]() |
why not, but what's the problem ? |
![]() ![]() |
vulca wrote:USOs official blog post Your self-updating, when you post an update and people come in droves, can cause a 502 or a 503 forced error even while browsing the site because your script homepage is larger than the meta.js routine. Changing it will also make your users much happier that you are conserving their bandwidth too when there isn't an update. Remember that Users may also have other user.js installed that also update checks too... too many requests on USO and instant breakage/delays. The meta.js routine ensures that only what is relevant is returned instead of clogging up the internet bandwidth. :) |
![]() ![]() |
ok, it will be done soon :) |
![]() ![]() |
Done ;)
Thanks |
![]() ![]() |
vulca wrote:Awesome and Thank you! :) vulca wrote: |
![]() ![]() |
all done :) |
![]() ![]() |
vulca wrote:Kewlieez! :) Thanks... many happy users soon. |


