![]() ![]() |
Hey Everyone, I just wanted to let you all know that I'm forking Greasemonkey, and calling the new extension Scriptish, the first beta is ready now, and I'm nearly ready to release a second beta soon, you can find it here if you are interested: https://addons.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/addon/... The minVersion of Firefox I plan to support will be 4.0, so it will only work with 4.0 betas atm. Some new features that'll be available in 0.1 will be:
Scriptish is also integrated with the addon manager, as Greasemonkey will be in it's next version, so that may be a surprise to some that try this. And hopefully some more stuff to make sure it gets through the AMO editor requirement that it not be a total duplicate. Let me know what you think, you can submit issues here: http://github.com/erikvold/scriptish/issues I hope you give it a try, Thanks! |
![]() ![]() |
Erik Vold wrote: Erik Vold wrote: Erik Vold wrote: Erik Vold wrote: +1 |
![]() ![]() |
I'm posting all of my ideas for future releases here: http://github.com/erikvold/scriptish/issues (I just put a few more up) please vote for the ones that you'd like to see and add ones that I haven't posted yet, so that I can get an idea of what other people want. |
![]() ![]() |
If you do, may I encourage starting with ditching backwards compatibility with everything that was an unintentional design bug, like the default rule of The technical decision should come fairly easy, I think, as it means you'll initially get the most technical and pleasant (well, competent), users, scriptwrights and extension developers to switch over first, while leaving Greasemonkey with the progress-deterring user base that have the all the relatively uninteresting (and most frequent problems) with using it, until such time as people update to the better-than-GM GM, on its many merits. Also, I think you would gain much from borrowing as much of the good design choices as you can from Chrome's (except for their user script UI), like killing @noframes and making that the default behaviour, and instead require One change you could do that I think would instantly appeal to a large crowd is sandbox-free unprivileged scripts, that can do only (but exactly!) as much as page scripts, with no gotchas -- effortlessly run jQuery and all the other javascript libraries, ideally without requiring any It might even be worth considering not offering the privileged APIs for a while, as all the cool HTML5 stuff coming fast now is pretty much deprecating what made GM more hackable for devs around the turn of the century. I don't know about what your own experience with the Github issues system, but unless you like it and find it far less painful than me and Anthony does Github's, you might want to consider following Olivier Cornu's example (maybe after checking in with him about his own experience from WebMonkey) and try out lighthouseapp.com for the fork. I use it a bit at work, and while its integration with github hasn't been perfect in every detail in my experience, it has never been outright annoying to use so far. Well, that's the off-the-top-of-my-head thoughts -- I hope you'll have lots of fun and keep making awesome software, as you have with Greasemonkey so far. Don't be afraid to hang around still, and the best of luck with the project! |
![]() ![]() |
Johan Sundström wrote: One of my goals is to support as many user scripts that already exist as possible, I don't see any reason for the community to relearn anything. Also I like the default @include *, I don't see any reason to change it, just opinions. Johan Sundström wrote: Same as above, I want to support as many existing user scripts as possible, and avoid causing unnecessary confusion. To me the existing GM api & metadata block is a standard that I plan to adhere to. Johan Sundström wrote: I like both of those ideas, I'm not sure if you mean inserting jquery and/or other libs into the sandbox env or the page env, or both, but I plan to add jquery to the sandbox env already, issue 27, since all of the newbs seem to use it. Johan Sundström wrote: I've always thought user scripts should be able to do everything a page script can and as much safe browser manipulation as possible. I'm not sure which API you're referring to, old api, or the new api I've introduced. But, I wouldn't cut GM_worker because user scripts can't use normal Workers (even if they could they can't use cross domain xhr) nor would I cut GM_notification because idk that html5 will support that, nor would I cut GM_setClipboard for the same reason, plus I imagine if html5 ever were to then a user would have to give a site permission to use it, and if that were the case then if a user script wanted to use it, then the user would have to give the site permission in order for the user script to use the feature (clipboard/notification/ w/e), which is not something I like. Besides that I've got nothing against handy GM_ api that do the same as HTML but makes it easier, so long as it's a common use case, and might save a newb some time. Johan Sundström wrote: I like the github issue tracker, it's almost exactly what I want. The ajax interface is crap, and I wish there was a way to make sure you get email notifications for issues on a other user's repo. But if I had those two things fixed, I'd be perfectly happy with it. I'm sure it'll get better though, and it's good enough for me atm anyhow. Johan Sundström wrote: Thanks for the input Johan, and I think I get where you're coming from with the comments towards the top, we need a reboot of a kind for user scripts, and I've been planning on designing a new type of scripting extension for Firefox, which Scriptish would support in addition to user scripts, mixing some ideas from Jetpack and GM, that's all I'll say for now though. First, I want to make user scripts as powerful as I've always wanted them to be. |
![]() ![]() |
Very nice! Glad there is some competition now! Not that it really matters! I like both! Just wish it worked on Firefox 3.6.x but that is ok that is a waste of time to do now. |
![]() ![]() |
Eric, is there a hack or something that we can do to get Firebug and Scriptish to play nicely with each other in the latest Firefox 4 beta? |
![]() ![]() |
Good work, Erik.
|
![]() ![]() |
Hello Eric I have installed scriptish with the koc official bot and tools and they wont keep the settings that I make and it crashes firefox regularly also I keep getting certificate verification is there something I can do to get this to work |
![]() ![]() |
This is cool! Thanks for sharing! |
![]() ![]() |
Is Scriptish still maintained? |
![]() ![]() |
Alexo wrote:The last code commit is from a half year ago, if that's what you want to know. https://github.com/scriptish/scriptish/commits/... |
![]() ![]() |
Is it nice? I kinda gave up on trying things until they claim to have V 1.0.0. If it took 3 years to get from 0.1 to 0.1.8 then 1.0 would be 30 years and 9 months? hehehe But now I don't know what I'm missing. |
![]() ![]() |
Alexo wrote:I believe Scriptish shares the fate of the last Greasmonkey fork (Webmonkey). |
![]() ![]() |
There is Scriptish nightlies BTW
|
![]() ![]() |
LouCypher wrote:The last changed occured last September. A nightly is generated regarless of any changes being made. |
![]() ![]() |
The maintainer modified a bunch of issues yesterday. Seemingly abandoned with commits for a long time leaving a very bad user experience. |
![]() ![]() |
sizzlemctwizzle wrote:https://github.com/scriptish/scriptish-nightlies/downloads |
![]() ![]() |
there are no changes, just updates to the metadata |




