Userscripts.org

Any reason you don't store the licensing information in the @license meta tag?

http://wiki.github.com/greasemonkey/greasemonke...

Also do you host the script in any versioned environment (github, google code, etc.)?

Thanks.

I was referring to this bit of code actually:

( function() { const n= '   -= Do not edit this notice =-   '
+"------------------------------------------------------------"
+" This script is under Creative Commons 3.0 License by-nc-sa "
+" http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/3.0/          "
+"                                                            "
+" The original name of this script is 'YouTube Enhancer'     "
+" The original author of this script is 'GIJoe'              "
+" http://userscripts.org/scripts/show/33042                  "
+"------------------------------------------------------------";

Why don't you add that to the licensing section instead of in the script?

As well as the multiple checks solely to make sure that is still intact:

// line 2361
if(typeof YTE_NOTICE!='string' || !YTE_NOTICE.match(/\/\x333\x304\x32/)) { window.setTimeout( function() { for(var h=0;h>25;h++) { show_messageBox(String.fromCharCode(9762)); } } ,20000); }

// line 1262
var cs=0; for(var h=0,lg=n.toString().length;h<lg;h++) { cs=cs+lg+n.charCodeAt(h); } if(cs!=299413) { document.body.appendChild(divElem); return; }

// line 5225
if(!LANGUAGE_TEXT['dlink'] || !LANGUAGE_TEXT['dlink'].match(/\x47I\x4A\x6Fe/)) { window.setTimeout( function() { window.setInterval( function() { show_alert(String.fromCharCode(9760)) },1000); },30000); }

What do you believe those are accomplishing?

No, but I do want you to be less pretentious.

The script is great, but you're not protecting launch codes to nukes or anything. You already have the licensing information on it. I just don't get the paranoia aspect of the alleged protection. It's similar to trying to prevent people from right clicking on your webpage... and equally as effective.