|
|
I'm just wondering if Greasefire takes into account Does anyone know offhand if I'm right here, or have I done something wrong (or am I being very blind)? |
|
|
Well it's been a couple of days now since I made this topic; does no one know what I'm talking about here? Am I posting this in the wrong place? |
|
|
znerp wrote:I haven't torn apart the addon yet... it's on my todo list... however I can say that the criteria for inclusion into the database is a bit "too strict" per say... give it some time and they may resolve it. I had to wait over 3 weeks for one of mine to reshow up. :\ |
|
|
@Marti: Thanks for replying. I've been meaning to look at the add on in more depth at some point, but similar to yourself I haven't found myself with a spare hour or so yet. |
|
|
znerp wrote:hehe I know the feeling... you might want to try a manual db update too... last I read they are still having issues with that portion. |
|
|
speaking of includes... why isn't there a way to include a regexp? you can distinguish it from the "wildcard" format because it could be in the literal form. for example: /^https?:\/\/(?:www\.)?google\.com\//i instead of having to worry about including many things past the dot, or having several includes which are converted into several regexp's. i should file a ticket on greasemonkey's site, but i have a feeling the writer of GM doesn't check it... does anyone know his email / who he is? (or they)? |
|
|
Avindra Gool... wrote: I know there's been discussion of this on these forums before. You may want to search (although I guess include and regexp are common enough that you'll likely find nothing). One example I can think of off the top of my head is here - Include/Exclude Rules Also worth looking at; Use the mailing lists for extension issues |
|
|
znerp: Greasefire should handle the special "tld" wildcard. Can you give me an example of a script that should be matching a particular website URL? |
|
|
Steve Krulewitz wrote: I did in my first post; http://userscripts.org/scripts/review/9174 |
|
|
Further to my above post, it seems to be showing now in the list now so I don't know what's happened there. Thanks for your reply though. |
|
|
Great, I'm glad it is working! |