@jesse ==> XHTML 1.0 Transitional Mistakes
|
|
Hey jesse, found a couple of errors with w3's validation tool. I'm assuming you'd care about it, seeing as this is a Web 2.0-style website and you're using XHTML markup. Here are the fixes: 1) Line 22, Column 25: there is no attribute "height".
<h1><a href="/" height="24" title="Userscripts.org"><img alt="Userscripts.org" height="24" src="http://static.userscripts.org/images/userscripts.org.png?1227415626" /></a></h1> to: <h1><a href="/" title="Userscripts.org"><img alt="Userscripts.org" src="http://static.userscripts.org/images/userscripts.org.png?1227415626" /></a></h1> (since the height is already 24, everything else will follow) 2-7) Line 375, Column 79: cannot generate system identifier for general entity "color".
<script src="http://userscripts.uservoice.com/widgets/tab.js?alignment=right&color=f18705" type="text/javascript"></script> to: <script src="http://userscripts.uservoice.com/widgets/tab.js?alignment=right&color=f18705" type="text/javascript"></script> or even: <script src="http://userscripts.uservoice.com/widgets/tab.js" type="text/javascript"></script> (the parameters don't do anything?) 8-9) document type does not allow element "script" here.
</body> <script type="text/javascript">var auth_token = '9b7dfc9831d46f763fb113e7fca0d9dacdf4684e';</script> to: <script type="text/javascript">var auth_token = '9b7dfc9831d46f763fb113e7fca0d9dacdf4684e'</script> </body> These are errors on the homepage only; i'll check out other parts of the site later. also, I could help you migrate this site to the XHTML 1.1 specification, which is stricter than XHTML 1.0 Transitional, but allows pages to render well on many devices. |
|
|
I fixed those issues. Thanks for spotting them. As for XHTML 1.1 I'll have to read about what new things it requires first. |
|
|
Okay on the forums, there are several errors: 1) Numbers starting id's
<tr class="post hentry " id="79717-row"> Are those even needed? I think it'd be fine as: <tr class="post hentry"> or if they're needed: <tr class="post hentry" id="row-79717"> , then recode as necessary. 2) Spinners lacking alt-attributes, and closing properly:
<img src='/images/spinner_bounce.gif' style='display:none; vertical-align:middle;' id='edit-79689_spinner'> to: <img src="/images/spinner_bounce.gif" style="display:none;vertical-align:middle" id="edit-79689_spinner" alt="Spinner"/> 3) "Voices" Section has stray list tags
<h5>Voices</h5>
<a href="/users/61251" rel="nofollow" title="avg"><img alt="" class="photo" height="32" src="http://www.gravatar.com/avatar.php?gravatar_id=615a797afdf93c242e2b86221b9d02e6&r=PG&s=32&default=identicon" width="32" /></a></li>
to:
<h5>Voices</h5>
<a href="/users/61251" rel="nofollow" title="avg"><img alt="" class="photo" height="32" src="http://www.gravatar.com/avatar.php?gravatar_id=615a797afdf93c242e2b86221b9d02e6&r=PG&s=32&default=identicon" width="32" /></a>
|
|
|
On the main forums page: The error:
<p class="desc"><p>Have an idea for a killer script? Talk about it in here.</p>
</p>
Perhaps you meant:
<p class="desc">Have an idea for a killer script? Talk about it in here.</p>
? The browser (firefox 3.0.4) renders it as :
<p class="desc"></p>
<p>Have an idea for a killer script? Talk about it in here.</p>
But since the browser renders it this way (no text content), it's like the additional "p" element was never there anyway. |
|
|
On the scripts page, <a href="http://www.amazon.com/exec/obidos/ASIN/0596101651/ref%3Dnosim/diveintomark20"><img style="display: block; margin: 5px auto" border="0" src="/images/greasemonkeyhacks.jpg" alt="Greasemonkey Hacks"></a> should be:
<a href="http://www.amazon.com/exec/obidos/ASIN/0596101651/ref%3Dnosim/diveintomark20"><img style="display: block; margin: 5px auto" border="0" src="/images/greasemonkeyhacks.jpg" alt="Greasemonkey Hacks" /></a> |
|
|
On the users page, the search doesn't have an action attribute:
<form class="search" method="get"><label for="q" id="q_label">Find user by name</label><input id="q" name="q" type="text" /></form> to <form action="somethinghere" class="search" method="get"><label for="q" id="q_label">Find user by name</label><input id="q" name="q" type="text" /></form> |
|
|
On scripts pages in general, 1) Broken "span" :
<div class="postactions"> <span class="share stumble"><a href="http://www.stumbleupon.com/submit?url=http%3A%2F%2Fuserscripts.org%2Fscripts%2Fshow%2F26062" rel="nofollow">Stumble It!</a></span> <span class="discuss"><a href="/scripts/discuss/26062" rel="nofollow">Discuss this script</a> </div> should be:
<div class="postactions"> <span class="share stumble"><a href="http://www.stumbleupon.com/submit?url=http%3A%2F%2Fuserscripts.org%2Fscripts%2Fshow%2F26062" rel="nofollow">Stumble It!</a></span> <span class="discuss"><a href="/scripts/discuss/26062" rel="nofollow">Discuss this script</a> </span></div> ? 2) None of the bar images in the Review Box have "alt" attributes (required in XHTML 1 trans) 3) Broken spans in orange review bars.
<td class="value"><span><img src="/images/bar.gif" height="10" width="33" /></td> <!-- NO SPAN CLOSER -->
change to:
<td class="value"><span><img src="/images/bar.gif" height="10" width="33" /></span></td>
? |
|
|
I think I fixed all of these save the "spinner" issue, since Rails is generating that (incorrectly). Once I move from prototype.js to jQuery, I'll redo the ajax integration code. |
|
|
( mooTools is nice as well ) I like it better because it has the standards for easy element creation, ajax requests and wonderful bits like the $$ function, but it has crazy-awesome ways to manipulate and "slide" css attributes. Check it out! |
|
|
I agree that moo is nice. I prefer jQuery because it is what I know and am productive in. The ajax on this site is purposely minimal (if you were around when Britt and I first launched the site as greasemonkeyed.com, you might remember TONS of pointless ajax). |
|
|
Oh I found one more mistake (on all user profiles) There's this stray bit laying around:
<style type="text/css">li{ list-style:none }</style>
outside of the "head" section. move to stylesheet or head? |
|
|
I don't notice much about those errors |
|
|
Probably not no, because most browsers "fix" these things themselves. But that doesn't mean we have to get rite of them, and do it the "correct" way. |
|
|
Ya, I appreciate it! |
|
|
Yeah, that's the way it used to be: you make a web page, and check around every browser and make sure it looks okay. But if you obey web standards set by the W3C, you're helping the strive for a brighter future of the internet by following the rules, so that HTML rendering is no longer a guessing game, and something that is defined solidly. Plus, valid XML is required for many things, like JavaScript's DOMParser. |
