Archived Comments (locked)
9 posts,
7 voices
Jesse Andrews
Admin
|
The following is an archive of comments made before threaded discussions was implemented (November 16th, 2008) |
Joel H
Script's Author
|
That's what I get for using a "code" tag in text... On that note, it should be possible to edit posts here, but I don't see how. What I meant to say is: I have a question for the user base: under what conditions should the code be highlighted? "code" tags and the "pre" setup used by us.o forums are obvious answers, but what other conditions should trigger it? I've been thinking that it should be possible to require a certain number of syntax matches per number of characters in the tags, but that might not work in all cases. I'm open to suggestions on how to approach this problem. -Joel |
|
Joel H
Script's Author
|
I've been working on incorporating the google script into this one; it's a bit of a project, so I'll have to try to take time this weekend to work on it. I have a question for the user base: under what conditions should the code be highlighted? |
masterfuol
Scriptwright
|
@Junk Blocker gm wrapper for google-code-prettify, supports js/css as per the google-code script: http://userscripts.org/scripts/show/8065 @Adrian I tried adapting my google-code-prettify wrapper for *.js files but ran into a brickwall due to the mimetype being text/plain or text/javascript meaning that firefox doesnt render them as html. Couldnt find any way around this except for making and extension or hacking greasemonkey. |
Junk Blocker
Scriptwright
|
Just saw this http://code.google.com/p/google-code-prettify/ which might be relevant. |
Alan K
Scriptwright
|
very nice, you did what i didnt hav time to do. but it still doesnt work... |
Adrian
Scriptwright
|
Nice idea. But it would be great if it worked on *.js files, and http://userscripts.org/scripts/source/* |
Henrik N
Admin
|
Oops, sorry about that. That was test text intended for a local instance of this site. :D |
|
Henrik N
Admin
|
apa
lapa |
