Archived Comments (locked)
|
|
The following is an archive of comments made before threaded discussions was implemented (November 16th, 2008) |
||
|
|
will you PLEASE update this script! |
||
|
|
RE: |
||
|
|
How do you check an MD5 sum? I'm not sure, but do we download the MD5 sum from http://www.efoxdesigns.com/max/downloads/Screen Userscripts/ after we install Screen Userscripts? |
||
|
|
I am thankful for this script. People like me who are not experts in javascript can have at least a small level of defense against malicious codes. |
||
|
|
So, for those of you wondering, there is a bug in the current downloadable version of this script, that I haven't had time to fix yet. Basically, what happens, is that when you upgrade to this version, you will get a message saying that you don't have the current version, when, in fact, you do. All you have to do is click the box, to ignore it forever. (Until, possibly a new version comes out.)
|
||
|
|
I'm with Lucanos on this. It's pretty easy to come up with some convoluted expression that yields |
||
|
|
An interesting concept - I have had a look at the code (I am no PHP or JavaScript expert, I should point out), but looking for strings which contain "*.php?cookie=*" seems pretty easy to work around - I'd simply change the variable name to "c", or not bother naming it at all. A simpler (and admittedly, possibly easier circumvented) technique may just be to scan for the string "cookie" inside the script. Just an idea... |
||
|
|
Very nice, I like it :D |
||
|
|
Yes, and they do. Screen Userscripts works on other sites besides us.org, such as this script's homepage
|
||
|
|
If it's possible to scan userscripts for cookie stealing, couldn't us.o do that on their end and flag scripts? |
||
|
|
<font>
|
||
|
|
while this is a valiant effort, the MD5 and SHA1 sums do not provide any additional authenticity verification. if the author of this script were to fall victim to a cookie-stealer script that compromised his USO account, the MD5 and SHA1 sums could be spoofed as easily as this script itself. |
||
|
|
Nice one! |
||
|
|
(By the way, Gasoline, even though the scan button does not appear on the description pages, they are still being scanned. It's just automatic.) |
||
|
|
Yeah, that's one of the features you can configure. Just set |
||
|
|
Ok, the new fetures works, great! but (jea, again :P)
|
||
|
|
All 'problems' thus far (I'm talking about those in the comments below) have been fixed.
|
||
|
|
Done. You now have the option to automatically scan, or be asked. (Another update is coming soon.) |
||
|
|
Same problem here as Gasoline- had - it slows down firefox way to much to use it. I am using firefox in ubuntu and it just flashes dark for 5-10 seconds (if not more) - all the browssing (tabs) are also freezed |
||
|
|
so, ok. ill testet this script
buuut:
featurerequest:
i would say, its a featurerequest on greasemonkey addon itselft, they should check the scripts and warn you if the script you will install is malicious. .... (sorry for my bad englisch ;) |
||
|
|
Let me try it :D |
||
