Archived Comments (locked)
|
|
The following is an archive of comments made before threaded discussions was implemented (November 16th, 2008) |
|
|
You're welcome bro. And yeah, it wont overload servers because you're going to click on the picture links and load them anyway. Plus, once they're loaded, they wont need to load again if you have a big cache enabled so it's not flooding the servers. |
|
|
Well, I'll be darn Joe! You did it! I used an adult website (that I won't name) that had a page of small thumbnails that when clicked would load the large size of that picture. It works! Now I don't need Fasterfox unless it's for the page load timer... and, people worry so much (I don't) about Fasterfox overloading servers etc, etc.. With your nifty script I can specify just the few galleries I'm interested in pre-loading and not pre-load everything (unless I want to). Way to go and again thank you so much for this script. I think a lot of people will be interested in this new feature. |
|
|
Mark2007, the script should now pre-load images that are linked to on the page also. You can test it if you want. Tell me if it works or not. If not, please tell me what the url is on the gallery you're viewing. |
|
|
Thank you Sir, I appreciate that. |
|
|
It should work for photo galleries (depending if the thumbnail is just a sized down version of where the link brings you.
|
|
|
I would love to have something like this to pre-load images from photo gallery pages of thumbnails so they "jump" on the screen when the thumbnail is clicked because they are being pulled from my Firefox cache. I miss not being able to use Fasterfox (in FF3.0.3) just for that feature and the page load timer. With a GM script I could be selective about which sites (gallery Image sites) to run it, but it's not doing that for me. Perhaps I'm missing something? Should it work with thumbnail gallery sites? Also..., thank you for all the scripts you have written! |
|
|
I don't want to re-download though, I just want them to download asap. |
|
|
(I think) that a) because document.images would be better because all the images are loaded there anyway. and b) (im guessing) that appending the source location will force it to redownload, and a pound (#) "negates" anything to the right |
|
|
Why |
|
|
how about: for(var i=0;i<document.images.length;i++) document.images[i].src+="#load" ? |
|
|
No, Greasemonkey scripts start before the page is loaded, hence why some people add onLoad listeners to their scripts. |
|
|
Just curious; does it even work? Because usually when I have a Greasemonkey script active, it only begins working after the page has already loaded. I mean, it's a decent idea, I just don't see that it would ever make things faster. Now you could write a script which would preload all the linked images and let them load more quickly when you clicked on the link, and I could see that working, although on an image-link-intensive page, it would be slow. |