3 reviews
bad coding
Review written by Marti - see all my reviews (20)
- 5 stars (EXCELLENT) - Not only does everything it claims, but it is significantly more useful than scripts of similar nature. This script is likely to be one you use often and you highly recommend it.
- 4 stars (GOOD) - Useful and easy to use, though not necessarily special. This script is recommended but may be more suited for some people over others.
- 3 stars (PASSABLE) - May have some design issues and/or some missing features. Any problems it has are not drastic enough to recommend against, and some people may still find it useful. Recommended for those who need it and are willing to give it a try.
- 2 stars (POOR) - Script is of low quality, usability, or just doesn't do what it says it should. You are recommending against this script, while noting that it might have some redeeming value for a few people.
- 1 star (BAD) - Script either doesn't work correctly or is utterly useless. You can't think of any significant reason why someone should give it a try and are recommending that it be avoided completely.
Making up metadata keys without asking the entire community first is a not recommended... non-portable.
EDIT: You were warned specifically about the Discussion group being specific to a single updater yet you added your updater to the list of scripts supported by usoCheckup... this will force a reevaluation of this review.
Does have a cute interface but too many prior obstacles are in the way with your aggressive behaviour and negative attitude in the general community. Good day. :)
Getting better with your most recent changes from suggestions offered.
I know there are other script updaters with a lot of work put into them, but they all seemed like overkill for what I wanted. This one is very clean, does what I need well, and has a nice stylish interface to boot.
