I was wondering if anyone could possibly do a quick fix of this script http://userscripts.org/scripts/show/881. The user has not updated it in two months and after asking multiple times has not responded. I was wondering if anyone could possibly do a quick fix of this script <a href="http://userscripts.org/scripts/show/881">http://userscripts.org/scripts/show/881</a>. The user has not updated it in two months and after asking multiple times has not responded.

2010-02-09T20:55:38Z

Forum

218346

45736

2010-02-09T20:55:38Z

Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.1; en-US; rv:1.9.1.7) Gecko/20091221 Firefox/3.5.7

111754

Thanks, mate :) I didn't think there would be a need to use a mouseevent and thought there would be a easier way. The unsafewindow trick did the work! Thanks, mate :) I didn't think there would be a need to use a mouseevent and thought there would be a easier way. The unsafewindow trick did the work!

2010-02-09T19:11:06Z

Forum

218284

45717

2010-02-09T19:11:06Z

Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 6.0; en-US; rv:1.9.2) Gecko/20100115 Firefox/3.6

96304

<pre>unsafeWindow.itemClick("0000000066");</pre> or use the click function: <pre>function click(A) { var B = document.createEvent("MouseEvents"); B.initEvent("click", true, true); A.dispatchEvent(B); } click(document.getElementByID("item0000000066"));</pre> You should've done a search. This has been discussed too many times now. <pre>unsafeWindow.itemClick("0000000066");</pre> or use the click function: <pre>function click(A) { var B = document.createEvent("MouseEvents"); B.initEvent("click", true, true); A.dispatchEvent(B); } click(document.getElementByID("item0000000066"));</pre> You should've done a search. This has been discussed too many times now.

2010-02-09T18:53:23Z

Forum

218275

45717

2010-02-09T18:53:53Z

Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 6.1; en-US; rv:1.9.2) Gecko/20100115 Firefox/3.6

61251

How would I go about achieving a click on this code: <pre> </pre> <code> </code> I tried: <code> 1. element = document.getElementByID('item0000000066'); if (element){ element.click(); } 2. element = document.getElementByID('item0000000066').onclick(); </code> Any advice? XD How would I go about achieving a click on this code: <pre> </pre><code> </code> I tried: <code> 1. element = document.getElementByID('item0000000066'); if (element){ element.click(); } 2. element = document.getElementByID('item0000000066').onclick(); </code> Any advice? XD

2010-02-09T18:37:00Z

Forum

218268

45717

2010-02-09T18:38:51Z

Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 6.0; en-US; rv:1.9.2) Gecko/20100115 Firefox/3.6

96304

On new topics, can Jesse / Jake please add a glaring notice about how to add code, either using a pastebin or &amp;lt;pre> tags? Every single day, n00bs can't figure out how to do it. This would benefit the forum daily. On new topics, can Jesse / Jake please add a glaring notice about how to add code, either using a pastebin or <pre> tags? Every single day, n00bs can't figure out how to do it. This would benefit the forum daily.

2010-02-09T17:44:16Z

Forum

218247

45711

2010-02-09T17:49:26Z

Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 6.1; en-US; rv:1.9.2) Gecko/20100115 Firefox/3.6

61251

I have a page that I do editing in. Unfortunately I have to do a great deal of editing but to do so I actually have to click on each box to open it up to insert anything and then let it close before I can move on. So I was wondering if it would be possible to open all the boxes on a page so I can enter the information and then click something to have it send the information to the web page. Tried posting the page source but does not allow me to. I have a page that I do editing in. Unfortunately I have to do a great deal of editing but to do so I actually have to click on each box to open it up to insert anything and then let it close before I can move on. So I was wondering if it would be possible to open all the boxes on a page so I can enter the information and then click something to have it send the information to the web page. Tried posting the page source but does not allow me to.

2010-02-09T17:06:34Z

Forum

218233

45707

2010-02-09T17:11:05Z

Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.1; en-US; rv:1.9.1.7) Gecko/20091221 Firefox/3.5.7

111754

<blockquote>... you're probably not using Chrome v4 or greater. Double-check by typing about:version in the URL bar. Note that if you're on mac or linux, as of Feb 1 2010, you'll need to switch to the dev or beta channel, since Chrome 4 isn't yet released on the stable channel for those platforms.</blockquote> <blockquote>... you're probably not using Chrome v4 or greater. Double-check by typing about:version in the URL bar. Note that if you're on mac or linux, as of Feb 1 2010, you'll need to switch to the dev or beta channel, since Chrome 4 isn't yet released on the stable channel for those platforms.</blockquote>

2010-02-09T17:00:26Z

Forum

218228

45688

2010-02-09T17:00:47Z

Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 6.1; en-US; rv:1.9.2) Gecko/20100115 Firefox/3.6

61251

in firefox and opera, userscript works after DOM-load. chrome was same. but in chrome, if add '@run-at document-start' to script header, script works not after DOM-load, but on document was loaded. (http://dev.chromium.org/developers/design-documents/user-scripts) this worked before Google chrome ver 4. but after ver 4, that doesn't work. script code was not changed, but script works after DOM-load. help me... in firefox and opera, userscript works after DOM-load. chrome was same. but in chrome, if add '@run-at document-start' to script header, script works not after DOM-load, but on document was loaded. (<a href="http://dev.chromium.org/developers/design-documents/user-scripts">http://dev.chromium.org/developers/design-docum...</a>) this worked before Google chrome ver 4. but after ver 4, that doesn't work. script code was not changed, but script works after DOM-load. help me...

2010-02-09T14:53:44Z

Forum

218185

45688

2010-02-09T14:53:44Z

Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.1; ko; rv:1.9.2) Gecko/20100115 Firefox/3.6

97749

Hi everybody I need to develop a script which checks value in particular text box & depending upon that value or value changes, I want to store values of other two text boxes to Microsoft Excel or Access. Also I want to store date & time on that particular event. Can it be possible with greasemonkey scripts or please suggest me other option. Basically I have one device connected in LAN. I can access operations of that device by typing address in my browser like http://192.168.1.5 I cant do any modification into that device. On a particular page text box values changes automatically. It has extension .cgi. if state of one text box changes e.g. from stand by to Listen , then I want to record values of other text boxes. Please help me Hi everybody I need to develop a script which checks value in particular text box & depending upon that value or value changes, I want to store values of other two text boxes to Microsoft Excel or Access. Also I want to store date & time on that particular event. Can it be possible with greasemonkey scripts or please suggest me other option. Basically I have one device connected in LAN. I can access operations of that device by typing address in my browser like <a href="http://192.168.1.5">http://192.168.1.5</a> I cant do any modification into that device. On a particular page text box values changes automatically. It has extension .cgi. if state of one text box changes e.g. from stand by to Listen , then I want to record values of other text boxes. Please help me

2010-02-09T05:37:18Z

Forum

218043

45656

2010-02-09T05:37:18Z

Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.1; en-US; rv:1.9.2) Gecko/20100115 Firefox/3.6

131624

If it's a: <ul> <li>DNS redirect... You are out of luck.</li> <li>HTTP request redirect... Probably not.</li> <li>HTTP meta redirect... install <a href="http://addons.mozilla.org/firefox/addon/992">RefreshBlocker</a> add-on and that will give you time to script the page.</li> <li>JavaScript redirect... you may need to disable JavaScript so it doesn't redirect but that opens up a whole load of issues normally.</li> If it's a: <ul><li>DNS redirect... You are out of luck.</li><li>HTTP request redirect... Probably not.</li><li>HTTP meta redirect... install <a href="http://addons.mozilla.org/firefox/addon/992">RefreshBlocker</a> add-on and that will give you time to script the page.</li><li>JavaScript redirect... you may need to disable JavaScript so it doesn't redirect but that opens up a whole load of issues normally.</li></ul>

2010-02-09T05:13:41Z

Forum

218039

45608

2010-02-09T05:14:11Z

Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux i686 (x86_64); en-US; rv:1.9.1.7) Gecko/20091221 Firefox/3.5.7

37004

<a href="/users/131594">WarmredAnn</a> is a <a href="/users/131594/posts">spammer</a>, most recently on topic <a href="/topics/45636">Hello!</a>, with <a href="/topics/45636#posts-217946">this post</a>. <a href="/users/131594">WarmredAnn</a> is a <a href="/users/131594/posts">spammer</a>, most recently on topic <a href="/topics/45636">Hello!</a>, with <a href="/topics/45636#posts-217946">this post</a>.

2010-02-09T02:47:47Z

Forum

217975

2010-02-09T02:47:47Z

Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.1; en-US; rv:1.9.2) Gecko/20100115 Firefox/3.6 (.NET CLR 3.5.30729)

23652

I can't think of a good way around that, because a greasemonkey script will never get a chance to run on the original URL, as it will likely be redirected before ever loading any content. So it won't appear in the history. But you could add a section at the beginning of Autologin that tests <code>window.location.href</code> to see if it matches the portal page that appears after a successful login, and if it does, automatically sets <code>window.location.href</code> to a different page. If you wanted to get fancy, it could use GM_getValue() to visit a page you specify from <code>about:config</code>. Even fancier, you could use GM_registerMenuCommand() to add an entry to the monkey menu which would call <code>window.prompt()</code> and then use GM_setValue() to change this pseudo-homepage. I realize that doesn't do exactly what you asked for, but this is the best thing I can think of. I can't think of a good way around that, because a greasemonkey script will never get a chance to run on the original URL, as it will likely be redirected before ever loading any content. So it won't appear in the history. But you could add a section at the beginning of Autologin that tests <code>window.location.href</code> to see if it matches the portal page that appears after a successful login, and if it does, automatically sets <code>window.location.href</code> to a different page. If you wanted to get fancy, it could use GM_getValue() to visit a page you specify from <code>about:config</code>. Even fancier, you could use GM_registerMenuCommand() to add an entry to the monkey menu which would call <code>window.prompt()</code> and then use GM_setValue() to change this pseudo-homepage. I realize that doesn't do exactly what you asked for, but this is the best thing I can think of.

2010-02-09T02:32:21Z

Forum

217971

45608

2010-02-09T02:32:21Z

Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.2; en-US; rv:1.9.2) Gecko/20100115 Firefox/3.6

76877

Hi folks, I wrote "Reddit fixer" hosted here at http://userscripts.org/scripts/show/39742, source code at http://userscripts.org/scripts/source/39742.user.js. I've been using the @require directive to pull in jQuery at http://ajax.googleapis.com/ajax/libs/jquery/1/jquery.min.js, and this has worked for a long time, but now it makes the script not run. When the metadata block @requires that file, the script seems to install successfully, but never runs. Replacing everything after the metadata block with an alert() call produces no output. The library address is good, and Greasemonkey always reports a good install. As soon as I remove the @require line and re-install, the script works perfectly. Reddit includes its own copy of jQuery, but requiring my own has always worked before, up until recently. Am I using the @require directive wrong, or is there some other reason that line is making my script not work? I am using Greasemonkey 0.8.20091209.4 on Firefox 3.6. I also reproduced the problem with Firefox 3.5.7. This happens on Windows XP x64 SP1, and on a fresh VM of WinXP x86 SP3. I appreciate any help. Hi folks, I wrote "Reddit fixer" hosted here at <a href="http://userscripts.org/scripts/show/39742">http://userscripts.org/scripts/show/39742</a>, source code at <a href="http://userscripts.org/scripts/source/39742.user.js">http://userscripts.org/scripts/source/39742.use...</a>. I've been using the @require directive to pull in jQuery at <a href="http://ajax.googleapis.com/ajax/libs/jquery/1/jquery.min.js">http://ajax.googleapis.com/ajax/libs/jquery/1/j...</a>, and this has worked for a long time, but now it makes the script not run. When the metadata block @requires that file, the script seems to install successfully, but never runs. Replacing everything after the metadata block with an alert() call produces no output. The library address is good, and Greasemonkey always reports a good install. As soon as I remove the @require line and re-install, the script works perfectly. Reddit includes its own copy of jQuery, but requiring my own has always worked before, up until recently. Am I using the @require directive wrong, or is there some other reason that line is making my script not work? I am using Greasemonkey 0.8.20091209.4 on Firefox 3.6. I also reproduced the problem with Firefox 3.5.7. This happens on Windows XP x64 SP1, and on a fresh VM of WinXP x86 SP3. I appreciate any help.

2010-02-09T02:04:08Z

Forum

217967

45640

2010-02-09T02:04:56Z

Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.2; en-US; rv:1.9.2) Gecko/20100115 Firefox/3.6

76877

<a href="/users/131594">WarmredAnn</a> is a <a href="/users/131594/posts">spammer</a>, most recently on topic <a href="/topics/45637">Hello!</a>, with <a href="/topics/45637#posts-217947">this post</a>. Multiple spams <a href="/users/131594">WarmredAnn</a> is a <a href="/users/131594/posts">spammer</a>, most recently on topic <a href="/topics/45637">Hello!</a>, with <a href="/topics/45637#posts-217947">this post</a>. Multiple spams

2010-02-09T01:09:21Z

Forum

217951

2010-02-09T01:41:43Z

Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux i686 (x86_64); en-US; rv:1.9.1.7) Gecko/20091221 Firefox/3.5.7

37004

Well it took a few days but I think I've finally made a viable version of the script <a href="/scripts/show/68219">uso - installWith</a>. What this script does is encapsulates USO's meta.js in an anonymous wrapper and adds one of the compatible updaters out there. I could use some testers to probe for ERRATA and if I've missed your @require updater let me know on the scripts <a href="/topics/45481">SUGGESTIONS page</a>... some things you should know... In order to keep the script wrapped your updater can not directly install the script unless you are aware of wrapping. <a href="/guides/24">usoCheckup</a> of course can directly install the script as it is aware of the wrapper. :) A lot of you have incomplete instructions on how to use your updater so I haven't checked all the others out there. "Chop to it" ;) Well it took a few days but I think I've finally made a viable version of the script <a href="/scripts/show/68219">uso - installWith</a>. What this script does is encapsulates USO's meta.js in an anonymous wrapper and adds one of the compatible updaters out there. I could use some testers to probe for ERRATA and if I've missed your @require updater let me know on the scripts <a href="/topics/45481">SUGGESTIONS page</a>... some things you should know... In order to keep the script wrapped your updater can not directly install the script unless you are aware of wrapping. <a href="/guides/24">usoCheckup</a> of course can directly install the script as it is aware of the wrapper. :) A lot of you have incomplete instructions on how to use your updater so I haven't checked all the others out there. "Chop to it" ;)

2010-02-09T00:16:44Z

Forum

217924

45631

2010-02-09T00:18:18Z

Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux i686 (x86_64); en-US; rv:1.9.1.7) Gecko/20091221 Firefox/3.5.7

37004

<a href="https://addons.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/addon/2108">Stylish</a> <pre>@namespace url(http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml); @-moz-document domain("sitehere.com") { a>img[src*="/images/smilies/"] {display:none !important;} }</pre> <a href="https://addons.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/addon/2108">Stylish</a><pre>@namespace url(http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml); @-moz-document domain("sitehere.com") { a>img[src*="/images/smilies/"] {display:none !important;} }</pre>

2010-02-08T20:01:16Z

Forum

217799

45577

2010-02-08T20:01:23Z

Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.1; en-US; rv:1.9.2) Gecko/20100115 Firefox/3.6 (.NET CLR 3.5.30729)

23652

I'm attempting to modify a script for personal use, specifically Autologin by clem ( http://userscripts.org/users/1302/scripts ), and I want it to work better with the Safeconnect system that my college implements. Under this system, at the beginning of a (apparently arbitrarily long) session, the system redirects you to a login page. If you fail to login, you cannot access the internet, but if you do login, you are redirected to a portal page, rather than the original URL you attempted to visit. Essentially, I want to add functionality to Autologin to grab that original URL, and redirect you to that page instead of the portal page. Oddly, simply going back doesn't work, because instead of the original URL it will reload the login page. This has something to do with the fact that Safeconnect sends the browser a permanent redirect code instead of a temporary one. I know the basics of Greasemonkey coding, and I was hoping someone could point me in the right direction, preferably some code or already existing script that accomplishes this kind of undoing redirection or grabbing a URL from the URL bar. Thanks in advance! NINJ4 I'm attempting to modify a script for personal use, specifically Autologin by clem ( <a href="http://userscripts.org/users/1302/scripts">http://userscripts.org/users/1302/scripts</a> ), and I want it to work better with the Safeconnect system that my college implements. Under this system, at the beginning of a (apparently arbitrarily long) session, the system redirects you to a login page. If you fail to login, you cannot access the internet, but if you do login, you are redirected to a portal page, rather than the original URL you attempted to visit. Essentially, I want to add functionality to Autologin to grab that original URL, and redirect you to that page instead of the portal page. Oddly, simply going back doesn't work, because instead of the original URL it will reload the login page. This has something to do with the fact that Safeconnect sends the browser a permanent redirect code instead of a temporary one. I know the basics of Greasemonkey coding, and I was hoping someone could point me in the right direction, preferably some code or already existing script that accomplishes this kind of undoing redirection or grabbing a URL from the URL bar. Thanks in advance! NINJ4

2010-02-08T19:03:41Z

Forum

217735

45608

2010-02-08T19:50:55Z

Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux i686; en-US; rv:1.9.1.5) Gecko/20091102 Firefox/3.5.5

32405

Hello, I try to add a top link into all the pages from a domain. I know it's not so complicated but I'm a big noob. I try with a mix a several script but can't make it work. Any help, please? Here is what I have: <pre>// ==UserScript== // @name Add Read all forums // @namespace * // @include http://forum1.com/* // @include http://forum2.com/* // ==/UserScript== if(window.location.href.indexOf("http://forum1.com")>=0) { // something for <a href="index.php?mark=forums">Mark all forums read</a> } if(window.location.href.indexOf("http://forum2.com")>=0) { // something for <a href="index.php?markread">Mark all forums read</a> }</pre> Hello, I try to add a top link into all the pages from a domain. I know it's not so complicated but I'm a big noob. I try with a mix a several script but can't make it work. Any help, please? Here is what I have: <pre>// ==UserScript== // @name Add Read all forums // @namespace * // @include http://forum1.com/* // @include http://forum2.com/* // ==/UserScript== if(window.location.href.indexOf("http://forum1.com")>=0) { // something for <a href="index.php?mark=forums">Mark all forums read</a> } if(window.location.href.indexOf("http://forum2.com")>=0) { // something for <a href="index.php?markread">Mark all forums read</a> }</pre>

2010-02-08T13:43:32Z

Forum

217605

45582

2010-02-08T13:44:19Z

Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.1; fr; rv:1.9.1.7) Gecko/20091221 Firefox/3.5.7 (.NET CLR 3.5.30729)

45473

the tag is <fairy> (ignore closing fairy lef tby this site) and the code is http://www.copypastecode.com/21831/ the tag is <fairy> (ignore closing fairy lef tby this site) and the code is <a href="http://www.copypastecode.com/21831/">http://www.copypastecode.com/21831/</a></fairy>

2010-02-08T12:31:44Z

Forum

217575

45577

2010-02-08T12:34:30Z

Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.1; en-GB; rv:1.9.2) Gecko/20100115 Firefox/3.6

119349

A powerful extension system like Mozilla's requires a deep architecture. Isn't just adding some code: it's rewriting the whole thing. Even if they went for it, they would have to give up speed, spend a lot of resources, and still risk ending up with an inferior clone of Mozilla. /conspiracy mode off A powerful extension system like Mozilla's requires a deep architecture. Isn't just adding some code: it's rewriting the whole thing. Even if they went for it, they would have to give up speed, spend a lot of resources, and still risk ending up with an inferior clone of Mozilla. /conspiracy mode off

2010-02-08T11:47:07Z

Forum

217567

41735

2010-02-08T13:21:49Z

Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.1; pt-BR; rv:1.9.2) Gecko/20100115 Firefox/3.6

20871

I thought this at first too but it's good to have the history of a contributor and their "choice of words" for self evaluation. I thought this at first too but it's good to have the history of a contributor and their "choice of words" for self evaluation.

2010-02-08T08:44:45Z

Forum

217526

45365

2010-02-08T08:44:45Z

Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux i686 (x86_64); en-US; rv:1.9.1.7) Gecko/20091221 Firefox/3.5.7

37004

<blockquote><a href="/users/24800">vOidSenses</a> <a href="/topics/3001?page=3#posts-216805">wrote</a>: i can't find a link for it anywhere</blockquote>LOL They've changed it a bit. Just start typing in the "I suggest you..." text box and it will come up. I guess this is a way to eliminate duplicates in case someone else has already made the suggestion. :) <blockquote><a href="/users/24800">vOidSenses</a> <a href="/topics/3001?page=3#posts-216805">wrote</a>: i can't find a link for it anywhere</blockquote>LOL They've changed it a bit. Just start typing in the "I suggest you..." text box and it will come up. I guess this is a way to eliminate duplicates in case someone else has already made the suggestion. :)

2010-02-08T08:43:40Z

Forum

217525

3001

2010-02-08T08:43:40Z

Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux i686 (x86_64); en-US; rv:1.9.1.7) Gecko/20091221 Firefox/3.5.7

37004

<blockquote><a href="/users/129416">Sagefire</a> <a href="/topics/44970?page=1#posts-216661">wrote</a>: Figured it out</blockquote>I can manipulate the i/frame as well but I'm wondering if manipulating the contents inside the i/frame is still possible. All the samples and documentation fail. I'm wondering if this is a "new thing" in the W3C. <blockquote><a href="/users/129416">Sagefire</a> <a href="/topics/44970?page=1#posts-216661">wrote</a>: Figured it out</blockquote>I can manipulate the i/frame as well but I'm wondering if manipulating the contents inside the i/frame is still possible. All the samples and documentation fail. I'm wondering if this is a "new thing" in the W3C.

2010-02-08T08:36:49Z

Forum

217523

44970

2010-02-08T08:36:49Z

Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux i686 (x86_64); en-US; rv:1.9.1.7) Gecko/20091221 Firefox/3.5.7

37004

<blockquote><a href="/users/83993">sine non qua</a> <a href="/topics/45562#posts-217477">wrote</a>: if not a redirect could it be loaded locally with a URI?</blockquote>It probably could be mirrored on your own, but you'd need to write a server side process to check for updates and/or strip out the privacy invasion bits... this is a lot of work and also suspect to extreme scrutiny if you share that uri with the world. <blockquote><a href="/users/83993">sine non qua</a> <a href="/topics/45562#posts-217477">wrote</a>: if not a redirect could it be loaded locally with a URI?</blockquote>It probably could be mirrored on your own, but you'd need to write a server side process to check for updates and/or strip out the privacy invasion bits... this is a lot of work and also suspect to extreme scrutiny if you share that uri with the world.

2010-02-08T06:54:05Z

Forum

217487

45562

2010-02-08T06:54:05Z

Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux i686 (x86_64); en-US; rv:1.9.1.7) Gecko/20091221 Firefox/3.5.7

37004

- or NOT + or AND | or OR n NEAR ex game -(facebook|myspace) 6 NEAR cheat exact phrase would be awesome as well - or NOT + or AND | or OR n NEAR ex game -(facebook|myspace) 6 NEAR cheat exact phrase would be awesome as well

2010-02-08T06:16:57Z

Forum

217481

45111

2010-02-08T06:16:57Z

Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.1; en-US; rv:1.9.1.1) Gecko/20090715 Firefox/3.5.5.0

83993