I hope I am posting in the correct place. I tried to install the script to fix the RT feature on Twitter to display 2 avatars in the RT. I receive this when I try to install it: Script: C\Users\Debbie\AppData\Local\Microsoft\Windows\Temporary Internet Files\Content.IE5\79K5KGTS\62338user[1]js Line: 35 Char: 1 Error: 'unsafeWindow' is undefined Code: 800A1391 Source: Microsoft JScript runtime error Thank you I hope I am posting in the correct place. I tried to install the script to fix the RT feature on Twitter to display 2 avatars in the RT. I receive this when I try to install it: Script: C\Users\Debbie\AppData\Local\Microsoft\Windows\Temporary Internet Files\Content.IE5\79K5KGTS\62338user[1]js Line: 35 Char: 1 Error: 'unsafeWindow' is undefined Code: 800A1391 Source: Microsoft JScript runtime error Thank you

2009-11-24T04:34:00Z

Forum

192842

40174

2009-11-24T04:34:00Z

Mozilla/4.0 (compatible; MSIE 7.0; Windows NT 6.0; Trident/4.0; SLCC1; .NET CLR 2.0.50727; .NET CLR 3.5.30729; .NET CLR 3.0.30729; MSN OptimizedIE8;ENGB)

118997

<blockquote><a href="http://userscripts.org/users/22480">znerp</a> <a href="http://userscripts.org/topics/40150#row-192754"> wrote</a>: Well I don't think that waste is a fair description.</blockquote> True. Kind of pointless outcome is a better one. It probably helped with his coding abilities though. <blockquote><a href="http://userscripts.org/users/34442">peteb</a> <a href="http://userscripts.org/topics/40150#row-192753"> wrote</a>: sizzlemctwizzle's script, that must be what I was seeing in other people's replies, I copied that "style" from responses I saw in the forums thinking it's what people were using as a hard coded norm for replying</blockquote> We both have the same style visually. Both our scripts do almost exactly the same thing, except his preview shows up in the reply textbox area, and mine shows up full screen in a div. <blockquote><a href="http://userscripts.org/users/34442">peteb</a> <a href="http://userscripts.org/topics/40150#row-192753"> wrote</a>: isn't it possible to "retire" or "deactivate" a script without deleting it?</blockquote> You can contact Jesse and have him unlist it if you wish. <blockquote><a href="http://userscripts.org/users/22480">znerp</a><a href="http://userscripts.org/topics/40150#row-192754"> wrote</a>: Well I don't think that waste is a fair description.</blockquote> True. Kind of pointless outcome is a better one. It probably helped with his coding abilities though. <blockquote><a href="http://userscripts.org/users/34442">peteb</a><a href="http://userscripts.org/topics/40150#row-192753"> wrote</a>: sizzlemctwizzle's script, that must be what I was seeing in other people's replies, I copied that "style" from responses I saw in the forums thinking it's what people were using as a hard coded norm for replying</blockquote> We both have the same style visually. Both our scripts do almost exactly the same thing, except his preview shows up in the reply textbox area, and mine shows up full screen in a div. <blockquote><a href="http://userscripts.org/users/34442">peteb</a><a href="http://userscripts.org/topics/40150#row-192753"> wrote</a>: isn't it possible to "retire" or "deactivate" a script without deleting it?</blockquote> You can contact Jesse and have him unlist it if you wish.

2009-11-23T23:05:16Z

Forum

192770

40150

2009-11-23T23:05:31Z

Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.1; en-US; rv:1.9.1.5) Gecko/20091102 Firefox/3.5.5 (.NET CLR 3.5.30729)

23652

<blockquote><a href="http://userscripts.org/users/34442">peteb</a> <a href="/topics/40150?page=1#posts-192740">wrote</a>: did I waste my time with this?</blockquote> Well I don't think that waste is a fair description. As Joe says, you reinvented a wheel, but I'm sure it's all good practice. <blockquote><a href="http://userscripts.org/users/34442">peteb</a> <a href="/topics/40150?page=1#posts-192740">wrote</a>: did I waste my time with this?</blockquote>Well I don't think that waste is a fair description. As Joe says, you reinvented a wheel, but I'm sure it's all good practice.

2009-11-23T22:05:05Z

Forum

192754

40150

2009-11-23T22:05:05Z

Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 6.1; en-GB; rv:1.9.1.5) Gecko/20091102 Firefox/3.5.5 (.NET CLR 3.5.30729)

22480

<blockquote> <a href="/users/23652">JoeSimmons</a> <a href="/topics/40150?page=1#posts-192753#posts-192749">wrote</a>: You made a quote script? 2 of these already exist. 1 from me, 1 from Sizzle. You wasted your time. Here are the links <a href="http://userscripts.org/scripts/show/47155">http://userscripts.org/scripts/show/47155</a> <a href="http://userscripts.org/scripts/show/48059">http://userscripts.org/scripts/show/48059</a> </blockquote> haha, ok, thanks for the info, I did do a cursory search and didn't come up with any, ah well, helped to pass the time :) sizzlemctwizzle's script, that must be what I was seeing in other people's replies, I copied that "style" from responses I saw in the forums thinking it's what people were using as a hard coded norm for replying isn't it possible to "retire" or "deactivate" a script without deleting it? I'd like to keep mine up on my script list for my own use. <blockquote><a href="/users/23652">JoeSimmons</a> <a href="/topics/40150?page=1#posts-192753#posts-192749">wrote</a>: You made a quote script? 2 of these already exist. 1 from me, 1 from Sizzle. You wasted your time. Here are the links <a href="http://userscripts.org/scripts/show/47155">http://userscripts.org/scripts/show/47155</a> <a href="http://userscripts.org/scripts/show/48059">http://userscripts.org/scripts/show/48059</a></blockquote> haha, ok, thanks for the info, I did do a cursory search and didn't come up with any, ah well, helped to pass the time :) sizzlemctwizzle's script, that must be what I was seeing in other people's replies, I copied that "style" from responses I saw in the forums thinking it's what people were using as a hard coded norm for replying isn't it possible to "retire" or "deactivate" a script without deleting it? I'd like to keep mine up on my script list for my own use.

2009-11-23T22:04:27Z

Forum

192753

40150

2009-11-23T22:18:00Z

Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.1; en-US; rv:1.9.1.5) Gecko/20091102 Firefox/3.5.5

34442

You made a quote script? 2 of these already exist. 1 from me, 1 from Sizzle. You wasted your time. Here are the links http://userscripts.org/scripts/show/47155 http://userscripts.org/scripts/show/48059 You made a quote script? 2 of these already exist. 1 from me, 1 from Sizzle. You wasted your time. Here are the links <a href="http://userscripts.org/scripts/show/47155">http://userscripts.org/scripts/show/47155</a> <a href="http://userscripts.org/scripts/show/48059">http://userscripts.org/scripts/show/48059</a>

2009-11-23T21:57:22Z

Forum

192749

40150

2009-11-23T21:57:22Z

Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.1; en-US; rv:1.9.1.5) Gecko/20091102 Firefox/3.5.5 (.NET CLR 3.5.30729)

23652

is it just me or do the threads have no "reply to" option for the threads? I ask for two reasons: 1) with all of my ad-block and such not sure if I'm blocking it, turned it all off, still nothing. 2) I wrote a script that adds the ability to the forums, please try it out and let me know if it works for you. did I waste my time with this? http://userscripts.org/scripts/show/62669 thanks :D is it just me or do the threads have no "reply to" option for the threads? I ask for two reasons: 1) with all of my ad-block and such not sure if I'm blocking it, turned it all off, still nothing. 2) I wrote a script that adds the ability to the forums, please try it out and let me know if it works for you. did I waste my time with this? <a href="http://userscripts.org/scripts/show/62669">http://userscripts.org/scripts/show/62669</a> thanks :D

2009-11-23T21:04:19Z

Forum

192740

40150

2009-11-23T21:04:19Z

Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.1; en-US; rv:1.9.1.5) Gecko/20091102 Firefox/3.5.5

34442

<a href="/users/110598">zhenghao</a> is a <a href="/users/110598/posts">spammer</a>, most recently on topic <a href="/topics/40124">Dungeon Fighter Online gameplay</a>, with <a href="/topics/40124#posts-192652">this post</a>. <a href="/users/110598">zhenghao</a> is a <a href="/users/110598/posts">spammer</a>, most recently on topic <a href="/topics/40124">Dungeon Fighter Online gameplay</a>, with <a href="/topics/40124#posts-192652">this post</a>.

2009-11-23T15:33:50Z

Forum

192667

2009-11-23T15:33:50Z

Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.1; pt-BR; rv:1.9.0.15) Gecko/2009101601 Firefox/3.0.15

55607

<blockquote><a href="http://userscripts.org/users/84330">Hoof Harted</a> <a href="/topics/40113?page=1#posts-192613">wrote</a>: i searched for similar problems on this site but could not find</blockquote> What exactly did you search for then? Did you try "<a href="http://userscripts.org/posts/search?q=Component+returned+failure+code%3A+0x80520012+%28NS_ERROR_FILE_NOT_FOUND%29+[nsIChannel.open]">Component returned failure code: 0x80520012 (NS_ERROR_FILE_NOT_FOUND) [nsIChannel.open]</a>"? Because that seems to yield some results for me... Seriously though, what did you search for? Bacause I can't find anything to search for in your error message that won't find a solution. <blockquote><a href="http://userscripts.org/users/84330">Hoof Harted</a> <a href="/topics/40113?page=1#posts-192613">wrote</a>: i searched for similar problems on this site but could not find</blockquote>What exactly did you search for then? Did you try "<a href="http://userscripts.org/posts/search?q=Component+returned+failure+code%3A+0x80520012+%28NS_ERROR_FILE_NOT_FOUND%29+[nsIChannel.open]">Component returned failure code: 0x80520012 (NS_ERROR_FILE_NOT_FOUND) [nsIChannel.open]</a>"? Because that seems to yield some results for me...Seriously though, what did you search for? Bacause I can't find anything to search for in your error message that won't find a solution.

2009-11-23T14:10:10Z

Forum

192648

40113

2009-11-23T14:11:03Z

Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 6.1; en-GB; rv:1.9.1.5) Gecko/20091102 Firefox/3.5.5 (.NET CLR 3.5.30729)

22480

<a href="/users/118886">ipada</a> is a <a href="/users/118886/posts">spammer</a>, most recently on topic <a href="/topics/40118?page=1">32GB Apple iPhone 3Gs Version...€180 euro</a>, with <a href="/topics/40118?page=1#posts-192627">this post</a>. null <a href="/users/118886">ipada</a> is a <a href="/users/118886/posts">spammer</a>, most recently on topic <a href="/topics/40118?page=1">32GB Apple iPhone 3Gs Version...€180 euro</a>, with <a href="/topics/40118?page=1#posts-192627">this post</a>. null

2009-11-23T14:01:39Z

Forum

192647

2009-11-23T14:01:39Z

Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 6.1; en-GB; rv:1.9.1.5) Gecko/20091102 Firefox/3.5.5 (.NET CLR 3.5.30729)

22480

i am using ff 3.0.15 with greasemonkey 0.8.2(first time user) when i try to install any script , this is the message i recieve. "Script could not be installed [Exception... "Component returned failure code: 0x80520012 (NS_ERROR_FILE_NOT_FOUND) [nsIChannel.open]" nsresult: "0x80520012 (NS_ERROR_FILE_NOT_FOUND)" location: "JS frame :: chrome://greasemonkey/content/utils.js :: getContents :: line 244" data: no]" P.S. as stated above , this is my first experience with greasemonkey , i searched for similar problems on this site but could not find. Any help please.. i am using ff 3.0.15 with greasemonkey 0.8.2(first time user) when i try to install any script , this is the message i recieve. "Script could not be installed [Exception... "Component returned failure code: 0x80520012 (NS_ERROR_FILE_NOT_FOUND) [nsIChannel.open]" nsresult: "0x80520012 (NS_ERROR_FILE_NOT_FOUND)" location: "JS frame :: chrome://greasemonkey/content/utils.js :: getContents :: line 244" data: no]" P.S. as stated above , this is my first experience with greasemonkey , i searched for similar problems on this site but could not find. Any help please..

2009-11-23T11:39:02Z

Forum

192613

40113

2009-11-23T11:39:02Z

Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 6.0; en-US; rv:1.9.0.15) Gecko/2009101601 Firefox/3.0.15 (.NET CLR 2.0.50727; .NET CLR 3.0.30729; .NET CLR 3.5.30729)

84330

<a href="/users/110598">zhenghao</a> is a <a href="/users/110598/posts">spammer</a>, most recently on topic <a href="/topics/40058?page=1">Introduction for DFO Gold</a>, with <a href="/topics/40058?page=1#posts-192372">this post</a>. null <a href="/users/110598">zhenghao</a> is a <a href="/users/110598/posts">spammer</a>, most recently on topic <a href="/topics/40058?page=1">Introduction for DFO Gold</a>, with <a href="/topics/40058?page=1#posts-192372">this post</a>. null

2009-11-22T14:40:11Z

Forum

192378

2009-11-22T14:40:11Z

Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 6.1; en-GB; rv:1.9.1.5) Gecko/20091102 Firefox/3.5.5 (.NET CLR 3.5.30729)

22480

Oh cool, it's working now! Dunno what you did, Jesse, but I'm happy. :) Oh cool, it's working now! Dunno what you did, Jesse, but I'm happy. :)

2009-11-22T08:09:41Z

Forum

192271

38153

2009-11-22T08:09:41Z

Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 6.0; en-US; rv:1.9.1.5) Gecko/20091102 Firefox/3.5.5 (.NET CLR 3.5.30729)

75641

@<a href="/users/4264">Jake Dahn</a> Maybe you could store the time a user accesses http://userscripts.org/messages/new along side authenticity_token and when they post to http://userscripts.org/messages you could compare the current time with the stored time. Since bots take almost no time between getting the authenticity_token and sending the message, whereas real users have to take time to type a message you should be able to catch bots red-handed. You'd probably only need a delay of a few seconds. Obviously sending one message too quickly shouldn't be grounds for account deletion because a user can copy and paste something pretty quickly. But you could store the number of times a user gets flagged and you could look at the messages they sent to see if they are spamming and then delete the user. @<a href="/users/4264">Jake Dahn</a> Maybe you could store the time a user accesses <a href="http://userscripts.org/messages/new">http://userscripts.org/messages/new</a> along side authenticity_token and when they post to <a href="http://userscripts.org/messages">http://userscripts.org/messages</a> you could compare the current time with the stored time. Since bots take almost no time between getting the authenticity_token and sending the message, whereas real users have to take time to type a message you should be able to catch bots red-handed. You'd probably only need a delay of a few seconds. Obviously sending one message too quickly shouldn't be grounds for account deletion because a user can copy and paste something pretty quickly. But you could store the number of times a user gets flagged and you could look at the messages they sent to see if they are spamming and then delete the user.

2009-11-20T21:08:59Z

Forum

191892

2009-11-20T21:09:39Z

Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; U; Intel Mac OS X 10.6; en-US; rv:1.9.1.5) Gecko/20091102 Firefox/3.5.5

27715

<blockquote><a href="http://userscripts.org/users/4264">Jake Dahn</a> <a href="http://userscripts.org/topics/9?page=27#row-191739"> wrote</a>: @joesimmons - same user?</blockquote> Ya. <blockquote><a href="http://userscripts.org/users/4264">Jake Dahn</a><a href="http://userscripts.org/topics/9?page=27#row-191739"> wrote</a>: @joesimmons - same user?</blockquote> Ya.

2009-11-20T09:41:17Z

Forum

191746

2009-11-20T09:41:17Z

Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.1; en-US; rv:1.9.1.5) Gecko/20091102 Firefox/3.5.5 (.NET CLR 3.5.30729)

23652

@joesimmons - same user? @joesimmons - same user?

2009-11-20T08:57:03Z

Forum

191739

2009-11-20T08:57:03Z

Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; U; Intel Mac OS X 10.6; en-US; rv:1.9.1.5) Gecko/20091102 Firefox/3.5.5

4264

Yes, I do too. I'm just a bit, shall we say, tired of always having to edit code online rather than uploading the script. Not a massive problem, but a broken feature annoys me a good bit. Also, I just (read: 5 minutes ago) tested this again, this time with IE 8, and it's broken there too. Yes, I do too. I'm just a bit, shall we say, tired of always having to edit code online rather than uploading the script. Not a massive problem, but a broken feature annoys me a good bit. Also, I just (read: 5 minutes ago) tested this again, this time with IE 8, and it's broken there too.

2009-11-20T04:53:56Z

Forum

191706

38153

2009-11-20T04:53:56Z

Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 6.0; en-US; rv:1.9.1.5) Gecko/20091102 Firefox/3.5.5 (.NET CLR 3.5.30729)

75641

<blockquote><a href="http://userscripts.org/users/sizzle">sizzlemctwizzle</a> <a href="http://userscripts.org/topics/9?page=27#row-191693"> wrote</a>: @<a target="" href="http://userscripts.org/users/2">Jesse Andrews</a> or <a target="" href="http://userscripts.org/users/4264">Jake Dahn</a> I was justed spamed by the user <a target="" href="http://userscripts.org/users/118318">melony</a> in a <a target="" href="http://userscripts.org/messages/11472">private message</a>. Sad to see the spammers already hacked the private messaging system.</blockquote> Yeah I was too actually. <blockquote><a href="http://userscripts.org/users/sizzle">sizzlemctwizzle</a><a href="http://userscripts.org/topics/9?page=27#row-191693"> wrote</a>: @<a href="http://userscripts.org/users/2">Jesse Andrews</a> or <a href="http://userscripts.org/users/4264">Jake Dahn</a> I was justed spamed by the user <a href="http://userscripts.org/users/118318">melony</a> in a <a href="http://userscripts.org/messages/11472">private message</a>. Sad to see the spammers already hacked the private messaging system.</blockquote> Yeah I was too actually.

2009-11-20T04:33:34Z

Forum

191704

2009-11-20T04:33:34Z

Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.1; en-US; rv:1.9.1.5) Gecko/20091102 Firefox/3.5.5 (.NET CLR 3.5.30729)

23652

@<a href="http://userscripts.org/users/2">Jesse Andrews</a> or <a href="http://userscripts.org/users/4264">Jake Dahn</a> I was justed spamed by the user <a href="http://userscripts.org/users/118318">melony</a> in a <a href="http://userscripts.org/messages/11472">private message</a>. Sad to see the spammers already hacked the private messaging system. @<a href="http://userscripts.org/users/2">Jesse Andrews</a> or <a href="http://userscripts.org/users/4264">Jake Dahn</a> I was justed spamed by the user <a href="http://userscripts.org/users/118318">melony</a> in a <a href="http://userscripts.org/messages/11472">private message</a>. Sad to see the spammers already hacked the private messaging system.

2009-11-20T03:44:00Z

Forum

191693

2009-11-20T03:46:47Z

Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; U; Intel Mac OS X 10.6; en-US; rv:1.9.3a1pre) Gecko/20091003 Minefield/3.7a1pre

27715

a troll indeed, and a bad one <blockquote> <a href="/users/12">LouCypher</a> <a href="/topics/9?page=27#posts-191452">wrote</a>: Marti has been <a href="http://groups.google.com/group/greasemonkey-dev/browse_thread/thread/33aec21f9b50cbfb/a42019f01cd0ed4d">ｂａｎｎｅｄ</a> for trolling greasemonkey-dev mailing list, so now he's trolling here. </blockquote> haha, that's rich, it's that kid from school who would do anything for attention and come out as a fool despite some other better qualities they fail to use. a troll indeed, and a bad one <blockquote><a href="/users/12">LouCypher</a> <a href="/topics/9?page=27#posts-191452">wrote</a>: Marti has been <a href="http://groups.google.com/group/greasemonkey-dev/browse_thread/thread/33aec21f9b50cbfb/a42019f01cd0ed4d">ｂａｎｎｅｄ</a> for trolling greasemonkey-dev mailing list, so now he's trolling here. </blockquote> haha, that's rich, it's that kid from school who would do anything for attention and come out as a fool despite some other better qualities they fail to use.

2009-11-19T16:40:47Z

Forum

191482

2009-11-19T16:54:41Z

Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.1; en-US; rv:1.9.1.5) Gecko/20091102 Firefox/3.5.5

34442

<blockquote><a href="/users/12">LouCypher</a> <a href="/topics/9?page=27#posts-191453">wrote</a>: Oh, I just remember he messed up the old Greasemonkey repository as well.</blockquote>I'm curious at what your justification for this libelous statement is... please elaborate in the appropriate forum. My contributions have always been in my own "branch" so your accusation is without merit as usual. <blockquote><a href="/users/12">LouCypher</a> <a href="/topics/9?page=27#posts-191452">wrote</a>: trolling</blockquote>Speaking of trolls... How are you? Did you really think that I haven't been honest and told everyone here about the misgivings of the dev group? (rhetorical question) Bringing this back on topic peteb (as do you) needs to disguise personal character assassinations better. Cheers! :) <blockquote><a href="/users/12">LouCypher</a> <a href="/topics/9?page=27#posts-191453">wrote</a>: Oh, I just remember he messed up the old Greasemonkey repository as well.</blockquote>I'm curious at what your justification for this libelous statement is... please elaborate in the appropriate forum. My contributions have always been in my own "branch" so your accusation is without merit as usual. <blockquote><a href="/users/12">LouCypher</a> <a href="/topics/9?page=27#posts-191452">wrote</a>: trolling</blockquote>Speaking of trolls... How are you? Did you really think that I haven't been honest and told everyone here about the misgivings of the dev group? (rhetorical question) Bringing this back on topic peteb (as do you) needs to disguise personal character assassinations better. Cheers! :)

2009-11-19T14:32:10Z

Forum

191460

2009-11-19T14:58:21Z

Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux i686 (x86_64); en-US; rv:1.9.0.15) Gecko/2009101600 Firefox/3.0.15

37004

Oh, I just remember he messed up the old Greasemonkey repository as well. Oh, I just remember he messed up the old Greasemonkey repository as well.

2009-11-19T14:15:46Z

Forum

191453

2009-11-19T14:15:46Z

Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.1; en-US) AppleWebKit/532.0 (KHTML, like Gecko) Chrome/3.0.195.33 Safari/532.0

Marti has been <a href="http://groups.google.com/group/greasemonkey-dev/browse_thread/thread/33aec21f9b50cbfb/a42019f01cd0ed4d">ｂａｎｎｅｄ</a> for trolling greasemonkey-dev mailing list, so now he's trolling here. Kids never learn. Marti has been <a href="http://groups.google.com/group/greasemonkey-dev/browse_thread/thread/33aec21f9b50cbfb/a42019f01cd0ed4d">ｂａｎｎｅｄ</a> for trolling greasemonkey-dev mailing list, so now he's trolling here.Kids never learn.

2009-11-19T14:14:11Z

Forum

191452

2009-11-19T14:41:21Z

Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.1; en-US) AppleWebKit/532.0 (KHTML, like Gecko) Chrome/3.0.195.33 Safari/532.0

<blockquote><a href="/users/34442">peteb</a> <a href="/topics/9?page=27#posts-191305">wrote</a>: (internet cops unite!)</blockquote>Sorry Petey... it's not Saturday morning yet for your cartoons. ;) <blockquote><a href="/users/34442">peteb</a> <a href="/topics/9?page=27#posts-191305">wrote</a>: Stay classy boy.</blockquote>Hmmm I haven't been called a boy in many decades... thanks! :) <blockquote><a href="/users/22480">znerp</a> <a href="/topics/9?page=27#posts-190814">wrote</a>: <blockquote><a href="http://userscripts.org/users/marti">Marti</a> <a href="/topics/9?page=27#posts-190799">wrote</a>: are you just being a Lemming and following the witch hunt?</blockquote>Well I hardly think that comment's fair.</blockquote>Ooops my bad... it would appear that you are correct... he seems to have been initially misidentified but luckily the system caught his secret identity. ;) <a href="http://s3.amazonaws.com/uso_ss/4081/large.gif"><img src="http://s3.amazonaws.com/uso_ss/4081/medium.gif"/></a> <blockquote><a href="/users/34442">peteb</a> <a href="/topics/9?page=27#posts-191305">wrote</a>: (internet cops unite!)</blockquote>Sorry Petey... it's not Saturday morning yet for your cartoons. ;) <blockquote><a href="/users/34442">peteb</a> <a href="/topics/9?page=27#posts-191305">wrote</a>: Stay classy boy.</blockquote>Hmmm I haven't been called a boy in many decades... thanks! :) <blockquote><a href="/users/22480">znerp</a> <a href="/topics/9?page=27#posts-190814">wrote</a>: <blockquote><a href="http://userscripts.org/users/marti">Marti</a> <a href="/topics/9?page=27#posts-190799">wrote</a>: are you just being a Lemming and following the witch hunt?</blockquote>Well I hardly think that comment's fair.</blockquote>Ooops my bad... it would appear that you are correct... he seems to have been initially misidentified but luckily the system caught his secret identity. ;) <a href="http://s3.amazonaws.com/uso_ss/4081/large.gif"><img src="http://s3.amazonaws.com/uso_ss/4081/medium.gif" /></a>

2009-11-19T13:43:26Z

Forum

191442

2009-11-19T14:43:35Z

Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux i686 (x86_64); en-US; rv:1.9.0.15) Gecko/2009101600 Firefox/3.0.15

37004

<blockquote> <a href="/users/marti">Marti</a> <a href="/topics/9?page=27#posts-191279">wrote</a>: You really seem to be daft on the context here... we aren't talking about you not to mention this wasn't addressed to you. (My point has been proven and thank you for that) :) </blockquote> You try to make it about others to turn it (unsuccessfully) around and when called on it you somehow think I'm daft? hahaha Seems that the only weapons you have is your smug elitism (internet cops unite!) and name calling/put downs. Stay classy boy. <blockquote><a href="/users/marti">Marti</a> <a href="/topics/9?page=27#posts-191279">wrote</a>: You really seem to be daft on the context here... we aren't talking about you not to mention this wasn't addressed to you. (My point has been proven and thank you for that) :) </blockquote> You try to make it about others to turn it (unsuccessfully) around and when called on it you somehow think I'm daft? hahaha Seems that the only weapons you have is your smug elitism (internet cops unite!) and name calling/put downs. Stay classy boy.

2009-11-19T01:45:29Z

Forum

191305

2009-11-23T14:25:34Z

Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.1; en-US; rv:1.9.1.5) Gecko/20091102 Firefox/3.5.5 (.NET CLR 3.5.30729)

34442

<blockquote><a href="/users/34442">peteb</a> <a href="/topics/9?page=27#posts-191248">wrote</a>: wrong again, everything I've done that's a modification of another script I add my own original code and then post it with all of credit up front to where it goes. I don't just copy/paste things together and repost it as my own. Nor do I make constant non-edit edits to my code to drive up it's presence.</blockquote>You really seem to be daft on the context here... we aren't talking about you not to mention this wasn't addressed to you. (My point has been proven and thank you for that) :) <blockquote><a href="/users/34442">peteb</a> <a href="/topics/9?page=27#posts-191248">wrote</a>: if you look at my post it was directed at how he uses tags (not related to his script) to drive up his traffic (leeching)</blockquote>Thanks for answering the question albeit indirectly... perhaps there is hope for you yet... this is already addressed elsewhere... did you search first? (I think not) :) <blockquote><a href="/users/34442">peteb</a> <a href="/topics/9?page=27#posts-191248">wrote</a>: meet kettle.</blockquote>Kitchen utensil fetish ay?! ;) <blockquote><a href="/users/34442">peteb</a> <a href="/topics/9?page=27#posts-191248">wrote</a>: wrong again, everything I've done that's a modification of another script I add my own original code and then post it with all of credit up front to where it goes. I don't just copy/paste things together and repost it as my own. Nor do I make constant non-edit edits to my code to drive up it's presence.</blockquote>You really seem to be daft on the context here... we aren't talking about you not to mention this wasn't addressed to you. (My point has been proven and thank you for that) :) <blockquote><a href="/users/34442">peteb</a> <a href="/topics/9?page=27#posts-191248">wrote</a>: if you look at my post it was directed at how he uses tags (not related to his script) to drive up his traffic (leeching)</blockquote>Thanks for answering the question albeit indirectly... perhaps there is hope for you yet... this is already addressed elsewhere... did you search first? (I think not) :) <blockquote><a href="/users/34442">peteb</a> <a href="/topics/9?page=27#posts-191248">wrote</a>: meet kettle.</blockquote>Kitchen utensil fetish ay?! ;)

2009-11-19T00:09:19Z

Forum

191279

2009-11-19T00:47:15Z

Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux i686 (x86_64); en-US; rv:1.9.0.15) Gecko/2009101600 Firefox/3.0.15

37004