Discussions on scripts by Joel H | Userscripts.org

Archived Comments, replied by Avindra V.G.

Avindra V.G. — Thu, 09 Oct 2008 18:58:25 +0000

you should make it delete the div instead:

// ==UserScript==
// @name           Google Video Cleaner
// @namespace      http://userscripts.org/users/24068
// @description    Formats Google Video to look more like the rest of Google
// @include        http://video.google.com/?*
// @include        http://video.google.com/
// @include        http://video.google.com
// ==/UserScript==

//get all divs
const divs = document.getElementsByTagName('div');

//delete all but the first five
for(var i=4;i<divs.length;i++) divs[i].parentNode.removeChild(divs[i])

Archived Comments, replied by prog_head

prog_head — Mon, 16 Apr 2007 02:11:06 +0000

hey man thanks so much!

it's funny... my browser still loads the whole page, then goes and deletes it! haha, lolz...

great job!

Archived Comments, replied by Joel H

Joel H — Sat, 24 Mar 2007 01:57:34 +0000

That's what I get for using a "code" tag in text...

On that note, it should be possible to edit posts here, but I don't see how.

What I meant to say is:

I have a question for the user base: under what conditions should the code be highlighted? "code" tags and the "pre" setup used by us.o forums are obvious answers, but what other conditions should trigger it? I've been thinking that it should be possible to require a certain number of syntax matches per number of characters in the tags, but that might not work in all cases. I'm open to suggestions on how to approach this problem.

-Joel

Archived Comments, replied by Joel H

Joel H — Sat, 24 Mar 2007 01:53:42 +0000

I've been working on incorporating the google script into this one; it's a bit of a project, so I'll have to try to take time this weekend to work on it.

I have a question for the user base: under what conditions should the code be highlighted? tags and the

 setup used by us.o forums are obvious answers, but what other conditions should trigger it? I've been thinking that it should be possible to require a certain number of syntax matches per number of characters in the tags, but that might not work in all cases. I'm open to suggestions on how to approach this problem.

-Joel

Archived Comments, replied by masterfuol

masterfuol — Fri, 23 Mar 2007 17:19:32 +0000

@Junk Blocker

gm wrapper for google-code-prettify, supports js/css as per the google-code script:

http://userscripts.org/scripts/show/8065

@Adrian

I tried adapting my google-code-prettify wrapper for *.js files but ran into a brickwall due to the mimetype being text/plain or text/javascript meaning that firefox doesnt render them as html. Couldnt find any way around this except for making and extension or hacking greasemonkey.

Archived Comments, replied by Junk Blocker

Junk Blocker — Thu, 22 Mar 2007 16:08:28 +0000

Just saw this

http://code.google.com/p/google-code-prettify/

which might be relevant.

Archived Comments, replied by Alan K

Alan K — Thu, 22 Mar 2007 05:02:30 +0000

very nice, you did what i didnt hav time to do. but it still doesnt work...

Archived Comments, replied by Adrian

Adrian — Wed, 21 Mar 2007 02:32:17 +0000

Nice idea. But it would be great if it worked on *.js files, and http://userscripts.org/scripts/source/*

Archived Comments, replied by Henrik N

Henrik N — Sun, 18 Mar 2007 09:34:01 +0000

Oops, sorry about that. That was test text intended for a local instance of this site. :D

Archived Comments, replied by Henrik N

Henrik N — Sun, 18 Mar 2007 09:33:05 +0000

apa
skapa

lapa

Archived Comments, replied by Jesse Andrews

Jesse Andrews — Wed, 17 Nov 2004 01:05:53 +0000

The following is an archive of comments made before threaded discussions was implemented (November 16th, 2008)

Archived Comments, replied by Jesse Andrews

Jesse Andrews — Wed, 17 Nov 2004 01:05:06 +0000

The following is an archive of comments made before threaded discussions was implemented (November 16th, 2008)