Discussion on inYOf4ceBook | Userscripts.org

broken on just profile pics?, replied by znerp @ Sat, 04 Jul 2009 06:48:56 +0000

znerp — Sat, 04 Jul 2009 06:48:56 +0000

Anyone wanna take a stab at fixing it?

Well I've had a go. It should work again now.

broken on just profile pics?, replied by brandobean @ Sat, 04 Jul 2009 01:00:34 +0000

brandobean — Sat, 04 Jul 2009 01:00:34 +0000

Me too. Used to work when you moused over someone's profile picture in a comment thread right? Bummer, I miss that. Anyone wanna take a stab at fixing it?

broken on just profile pics?, replied by STaRDoGG CHaMPioN @ Fri, 03 Jul 2009 22:39:46 +0000

STaRDoGG CHaMPioN — Fri, 03 Jul 2009 22:39:46 +0000

I'm seeing the same thing

broken on just profile pics?, replied by jms @ Fri, 03 Jul 2009 04:15:12 +0000

jms — Fri, 03 Jul 2009 04:15:12 +0000

long time user. long time fan. awesome script.

this seems to have happened in just the past couple days.

document.getElementById("content") is null error, replied by sizzlemctwizzle @ Tue, 05 May 2009 00:02:07 +0000

sizzlemctwizzle — Tue, 05 May 2009 00:02:07 +0000

Could you please change:

document.getElementById("content").addEventListener('DOMNodeInserted', inYoFace, true);
window.addEventListener('load', inYoFace, true);

to this:

// Re-run the code when the page changes
function process() {
  document.getElementById('content').removeEventListener('DOMNodeInserted', process, false);
  inYoFace();
  document.getElementById('content').addEventListener("DOMNodeInserted", process, false);
}

// Wait for Facebook's content element to exist
if (self.location == top.location) var checker=setInterval(function(){
    if(document.getElementById('content')) {
      clearInterval(checker);
      process(); // Start the listener
    }
  }, 200);

It would eliminate the document.getElementById("content") is null error

Edit: Thanks znerp

"Floating Images On Mouseover??", replied by znerp @ Sun, 26 Apr 2009 16:59:51 +0000

znerp — Sun, 26 Apr 2009 16:59:51 +0000

@Maged Samuel:

TO the best of my knowledge this problem should be eliminated if the thumbnail always appear on the top upper left of the screen

Well yes. This is why the script is written as it is.

@Dink:

if I could change the loading behavior of how it displays on the left first, then jumps to the hovered position.

This probably happens because it initially displays 27 pixels down and across from where the mouse enters the image. It probably wouldn't involve a lot more code to fix this, but that's not something I'd be interested in taking my time to do considering I won't be using it or publishing this in the near future.

As I say, if there's more interest in this then I might think about implementing it in a way similar to how you suggest.

"Floating Images On Mouseover??", replied by Dink @ Sun, 26 Apr 2009 14:28:27 +0000

Dink — Sun, 26 Apr 2009 14:28:27 +0000

I happen to like the end result if I could change the loading behavior of how it displays on the left first, then jumps to the hovered position.
Maybe this could be a configurable option in the "user script commands" feature in a future version?..
aside from making more work for you (just joking!!) thanks for your help!!

"Floating Images On Mouseover??", replied by Maged Samuel @ Sun, 26 Apr 2009 13:24:35 +0000

Maged Samuel — Sun, 26 Apr 2009 13:24:35 +0000

I tested your suggestions Znerp and it works but wanted to mention you an issue which is that the enlarged version of the thumbnail shows cut off if the thumbnail is near the bottom or top of the screen. The workaround is to scroll a little bit higher or lower to make more room for the full thumbnail to show completely but non only this workaround is not convenient but also it can't work in some cases in which scrolling down (or up) is the ultimate and can't scroll any further.

TO the best of my knowledge this problem should be eliminated if the thumbnail always appear on the top upper left of the screen

"Floating Images On Mouseover??", replied by znerp @ Sun, 26 Apr 2009 11:29:49 +0000

znerp — Sun, 26 Apr 2009 11:29:49 +0000

I'm not very happy with the code for this script at the moment. I've always subscribed to the philosophy that if you have to write the same/similar code more than twice then you're doing something wrong. At present, I have 3 blocks of similar code in this script, so you'd have to change them all. At some point I'll look at re-writing it to make it better, but it works as it is and I wanted to get a fix out quickly after the last Facebook change so that's why it is as it is.

This is completely untested and written on the fly, so you might need to tweak it. To do what you want you'll need to find everywhere I've put newDiv.getElementsByTagName("img")[0].src = fullsize; and add the following next to it...

newDiv.style.top = (event.clientY + 27) + "px";
newDiv.style.left = (event.clientX + 27) + "px";

You will also want to change all occurrances of this...

eventThingX = e.pageX;
eventThingY = e.pageY;

..to..

newDiv.style.top = (e.clientY + 27) + "px";
newDiv.style.left = (e.clientX + 27) + "px";

Hopefully that should all work. I really don't like the effect, but if more people request it I might look at building it into the script. If you make it work though please don't upload it as a script to userscripts.

"Floating Images On Mouseover??", replied by Dink @ Sun, 26 Apr 2009 08:14:32 +0000

Dink — Sun, 26 Apr 2009 08:14:32 +0000

I have seen a couple facebook image scripts that have a "floating" effect when you hover the mouse over a thumbnail. I like that effect alot, but this script is the only one that enlarges the wall photos also. So in trying to keep the ability of enlarging wall photos I was hoping there is a simple code change that I can do to add the "floating image" effect. I have tried all I know, so if you could help that would be awesome!! Here is the url's of those scripts that have that effect. Thanks!!

http://userscripts.org/scripts/show/12433

http://userscripts.org/scripts/show/11446

Last version has some glitched, replied by Maged Samuel @ Sat, 25 Apr 2009 08:51:33 +0000

Maged Samuel — Sat, 25 Apr 2009 08:51:33 +0000

Well, the last update eliminated a great deal of the problem in the sense that it decreased considerably the time the old elarged thumbnail was appearing before it gets updated with the correct enlarged thumbnail of the thumbnail i am hovering at.

I'm saying "eliminated a great deal of the problem" because I still can notice the older thumbnail for about just a 1/8 of a second and then the correct one appears but this transition makes a little bit "flicker" or so

Anyway, thanks a lot. The very last update - even though it did not eliminate the problem 100% - but is more better.

Last version has some glitched, replied by Maged Samuel @ Fri, 24 Apr 2009 23:43:51 +0000

Maged Samuel — Fri, 24 Apr 2009 23:43:51 +0000

Will try 2 explain it again in another way hopefully

Hovering on any thumbnail always show me the enlarged thumbnail version of the "PREVIOUS THUMBNAIL" and this lasts for a second or so but if i kept my mouse hovered and waitied a little more time (more than the 1 second time i estimated), the correct thumbnail shows finally instead of the old wrong one.
Hope this is clearer :)

Last version has some glitched, replied by znerp @ Fri, 24 Apr 2009 23:09:20 +0000

znerp — Fri, 24 Apr 2009 23:09:20 +0000

If I understand your problem correctly, I've just made a small change that might help with it. I don't experience that behaviour though, and I can't work out why it would act in that way.

Last version has some glitched, replied by Maged Samuel @ Fri, 24 Apr 2009 22:11:25 +0000

Maged Samuel — Fri, 24 Apr 2009 22:11:25 +0000

Hi
The very last version of this script has an issue which i hope i can describe it right:

Seeing hovering on a thumbnail for the 1st time, no problem
But hovering on another thumbnail shows me the enlarged version of the previous thumbnail and not the one I'm hovering at and this lasts for a second but I'm persistent (keeping the mouse hovered), i finally see the correct enlarged version of the current thumbnail

I believe this is annoying but I thank u for yr kind efforts
Maged

freeze Facebook, replied by rio @ Tue, 31 Mar 2009 08:21:11 +0000

rio — Tue, 31 Mar 2009 08:21:11 +0000

After using this script, facebook is freezed during loading some applications eg. FluffFriends and Backbook.

Any way to make it bottom right?, replied by Trel @ Fri, 20 Mar 2009 01:21:24 +0000

Trel — Fri, 20 Mar 2009 01:21:24 +0000

Ah ok. I can get it where I want, but I haven't figured out how to adjust for differing image size, maybe comparing will help me find that.

Any way to make it bottom right?, replied by znerp @ Thu, 19 Mar 2009 08:57:16 +0000

znerp — Thu, 19 Mar 2009 08:57:16 +0000

I don't think it's worth the time or effort to make this an option, however this would be easy enough to do if you wanted to have a go at it for yourself. That script is based on this script, and so it's pretty easy to see exactly what has been changed from this script to that, so it should give you some idea of what to change on the newest version of this script.

Any way to make it bottom right?, replied by Trel @ Thu, 19 Mar 2009 05:56:57 +0000

Trel — Thu, 19 Mar 2009 05:56:57 +0000

I'm used to the Facebook Thumbnail Enlarger script, however, it stopped working, so I had to switch. However, from that I'm used to having the image show at the bottom right. Could this be an option of some sort?

broken?, replied by znerp @ Wed, 18 Mar 2009 17:33:53 +0000

znerp — Wed, 18 Mar 2009 17:33:53 +0000

@keyrat: Oh yeah, I hadn't noticed that. This should be fixed now.

broken?, replied by keyrat @ Wed, 18 Mar 2009 15:08:26 +0000

keyrat — Wed, 18 Mar 2009 15:08:26 +0000

Hey, I hate to be picky, but there is one thing still missing right now. FB has added this share one picture feature to the news feed. When people post just one picture, inYOf4ceBook doesn't work on hover.

broken?, replied by znerp @ Tue, 17 Mar 2009 08:37:57 +0000

znerp — Tue, 17 Mar 2009 08:37:57 +0000

if you have the time (or inclination!) could you come up with something to shrink the fonts etc, but not pictures, similar to Facebook CSS Fixer.

Yeah, I really don't have the time or the inclination. This sounds like it should be simple enough though. For this it might be better to use the Stylish add-on and look on/request from the Userstyles site.

broken?, replied by LadFromWales85 @ Mon, 16 Mar 2009 21:53:02 +0000

LadFromWales85 — Mon, 16 Mar 2009 21:53:02 +0000

nice mate! cheers for that!
if you have the time (or inclination!) could you come up with something to shrink the fonts etc, but not pictures, similar to Facebook CSS Fixer.

Again thanks for making that change to your script, makes Facebook slightly more bearable! :)

broken?, replied by znerp @ Mon, 16 Mar 2009 17:50:32 +0000

znerp — Mon, 16 Mar 2009 17:50:32 +0000

@LadFromWales85: Ok, I've made a change that should make it compatible with the script you linked.

broken?, replied by LadFromWales85 @ Mon, 16 Mar 2009 01:09:41 +0000

LadFromWales85 — Mon, 16 Mar 2009 01:09:41 +0000

facebook square cut edition http://userscripts.org/scripts/show/44274 removes the curves around pictures, the status box etc.
With this script, your script no longer displays large thumbnails of pictures on hover.
Facebook Fixer does, though, but it displays pictures immediately on hover which is distracting.

Ideally love a mix of the Facebook css fixer, which makes fonts smaller (but sadly also makes pictures smaller), the straight edges, and your images on hover, but I can dream!

broken?, replied by znerp @ Sun, 15 Mar 2009 21:27:10 +0000

znerp — Sun, 15 Mar 2009 21:27:10 +0000

@LadFromWales85: What do you mean by your comment? Please expand on that.