Discussion on Definitive Google Auto Pager | Userscripts.org

Archived Comments, replied by wolssiloa @ Fri, 14 Nov 2008 00:56:37 -0600

wolssiloa — Fri, 14 Nov 2008 00:56:37 -0600

xx3734, I modified it like you said, and now when I double-click to activate, and I scroll down the results page, it says "Loading" but it doesn't actually load, it's just stuck.

Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.1; en-US; rv:1.9.0.4) Gecko/2008102920 Firefox/3.0.4 (.NET CLR 3.5.30729)

Archived Comments, replied by xx3734 @ Tue, 12 Aug 2008 16:08:46 -0500

xx3734 — Tue, 12 Aug 2008 16:08:46 -0500

Quasimodo:
I modified the script:

#80 'navbar'-> 'nav'
#86 document.body.scrollTop -> document.documentElement.scrollTop
#87 document.body.scrollHeight -> document.documentElement.scrollTop
#87 document.body.clientHeight -> document.documentElement.clientHeight
#102 //div[@id='nn'] -> //span[@id='nn']

and it works again.

(userAgent:Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.2; en-US; rv:1.9.0.1) Gecko/2008070208 Firefox/3.0.1)

Archived Comments, replied by Quasimodo @ Fri, 08 Aug 2008 09:28:41 -0500

Quasimodo — Fri, 08 Aug 2008 09:28:41 -0500

About a week ago, this stopped working. I bet Google changed its page structure.

Archived Comments, replied by JoeSimmons @ Sat, 21 Jun 2008 02:14:28 -0500

JoeSimmons — Sat, 21 Jun 2008 02:14:28 -0500

It's really hard to know if this is enabled or not.....

Archived Comments, replied by Shane Falco @ Thu, 14 Feb 2008 22:41:36 -0600

Shane Falco — Thu, 14 Feb 2008 22:41:36 -0600

hi !!
i am using Object oriented javascript for an extension (for this auto pager )and there the reference GM_setvalue(GM_*)didn't work !! wat may be the reason ??
i am getting the message as "ReferenceError : GM_setvalue is not defined"
even anything using GM(greasemonkey) doesn't work , how to obtain the reference ??

Archived Comments, replied by wolssiloa @ Wed, 26 Sep 2007 21:27:39 -0500

wolssiloa — Wed, 26 Sep 2007 21:27:39 -0500

If you use the Google Experimental version with Keyboard shortcuts, the shortcuts do not work with this script enabled. Can someone fix this?

Archived Comments, replied by Quasimodo @ Sun, 15 Jul 2007 10:00:38 -0500

Quasimodo — Sun, 15 Jul 2007 10:00:38 -0500

On Firefox/Mac, the numbers on the results page go 1-9 and then typically pick up at 31. No results are dropped, but this is disconcerting.

Archived Comments, replied by Quasimodo @ Sun, 15 Jul 2007 10:00:18 -0500

Quasimodo — Sun, 15 Jul 2007 10:00:18 -0500

To have auto-scrolling enabled at startup, I edited the script as follows:

Changed the inital setting for this variable from -1 to 1:
var Enable = 1;

Moved these three lines from the function dblClickEvents to the ending initialization block:
init_autopager();
insertLoadingText();
watch_scroll();
following the statement:
document.body.addEventListener etc.

Archived Comments, replied by pandaking @ Wed, 27 Jun 2007 06:49:07 -0500

pandaking — Wed, 27 Jun 2007 06:49:07 -0500

I like this a lot, but can we have an option to use the double click or not please.

Also, with the auto-updates, I would much prefer you just used the auto-update script:

User Script Updates - simply update the header of your script and your users will be able to receive change-notification when you improve this script...

Archived Comments, replied by Can't Say No @ Sun, 17 Jun 2007 22:29:00 -0500

Can't Say No — Sun, 17 Jun 2007 22:29:00 -0500

Just wanted to second everything Mentallo mentioned below. If you're going to bloat a script, you should seriously consider giving users the ability to easily enable or disable the additional features.

Archived Comments, replied by iescripts @ Tue, 22 May 2007 23:35:25 -0500

iescripts — Tue, 22 May 2007 23:35:25 -0500

This script has been ported to IE:

http://iescripts.org/view-scripts-111p1.htm

Archived Comments, replied by Clevermonkey @ Thu, 17 May 2007 09:05:39 -0500

Clevermonkey — Thu, 17 May 2007 09:05:39 -0500

Double-click to activate is the deal-breaker - annoying and pointless, when *wouldn't* I want this script to run? I'm ambivalent about the update checker - I haven't had it pop up (or whatever it's supposed to do) so I don't know how intrusive it is. Results numbering is actually a nice idea, helps if you've been scrolling for a while.

I hear Google is about to change the search results page, so Pawel might have to do a few tweaks anyway. Kill double-click activation please! Great script otherwise, thanks for updating the original.

http://www.betanews.com/article/Google_Unveils_...

Archived Comments, replied by Mentallo @ Tue, 15 May 2007 12:21:55 -0500

Mentallo — Tue, 15 May 2007 12:21:55 -0500

While this script is excellent the introduction of useless features like the result numbers, double-click and update windows, it's starting to be a little bloated. All we really need is the basic functionality of seemless google results. Please either make one basic version and one full featured version or make a options window.

Archived Comments, replied by Paul Irish @ Mon, 14 May 2007 13:11:46 -0500

Paul Irish — Mon, 14 May 2007 13:11:46 -0500

If anyone enjoys this functionality but wants a version without an update prompt or double-click to enable (and you're willing to forego some slight performance improvements), you should check out FaziBear's earlier version of this script: http://userscripts.org/scripts/show/6985

Archived Comments, replied by muvo @ Sat, 12 May 2007 23:39:30 -0500

muvo — Sat, 12 May 2007 23:39:30 -0500

Great script.

But I have a problem when I use it. It just doesn't work when I search by google.com. It's enabled, of course. There are even no numbers appear in front of the search result entries and nothing happens when I scroll down. But if I change the search site to google.ca, it works as it's expected to do. I am quite confused about this. Any thoughts?

Archived Comments, replied by Logan Koester @ Fri, 11 May 2007 21:29:03 -0500

Logan Koester — Fri, 11 May 2007 21:29:03 -0500

Great idea. Why didn't I think of it!? I just wish it were compatible with Google Ctrl+Arrow... that would be usability heaven.

Archived Comments, replied by Paweł Kubisz @ Fri, 11 May 2007 16:10:30 -0500

Paweł Kubisz — Fri, 11 May 2007 16:10:30 -0500

thx KosciaK - bug fixed

Archived Comments, replied by KosciaK @ Fri, 11 May 2007 15:09:08 -0500

KosciaK — Fri, 11 May 2007 15:09:08 -0500

Sometimes (for example http://www.google.com/search?q=myopathy) first ten results are always at the bottom. New results are appended above first ten

Archived Comments, replied by Paul Irish @ Thu, 03 May 2007 15:07:42 -0500

Paul Irish — Thu, 03 May 2007 15:07:42 -0500

What is going on with this script!?!?! It's highly annoying to throw an alert that the script has updated..
Also what purpose do these numbers serve?
This is getting frustrating and I'm about to branch off my own version of this script.

If you could, please create some preferences (maybe with gm_setvalue) so we can set the doubleclick functionality to how we want it, as well as enabling notification of new versions, and adding #s next to the results.

Thanks...

Archived Comments, replied by Mentallo @ Fri, 27 Apr 2007 13:57:18 -0500

Mentallo — Fri, 27 Apr 2007 13:57:18 -0500

Truly great script. One of the most useful Greasemonkey scripts ever. Congrats!

Archived Comments, replied by Paul Irish @ Thu, 26 Apr 2007 13:31:47 -0500

Paul Irish — Thu, 26 Apr 2007 13:31:47 -0500

I'm not really into the doubleclick functionality, can we make this a setting? I want it to always be on. Why should it ever be disabled?

Archived Comments, replied by Mach5 @ Thu, 26 Apr 2007 12:23:22 -0500

Mach5 — Thu, 26 Apr 2007 12:23:22 -0500

well that is freaking awesome. well done!

Archived Comments, replied by Paweł Kubisz @ Thu, 26 Apr 2007 09:20:11 -0500

Paweł Kubisz — Thu, 26 Apr 2007 09:20:11 -0500

the Google evolves permanently - they have changed a little bit theirs page that's why script stopped working - now it's fixed

Archived Comments, replied by KosciaK @ Thu, 26 Apr 2007 08:46:07 -0500

KosciaK — Thu, 26 Apr 2007 08:46:07 -0500

Is it something on my side or the script stopped working today? There's the loading image but no new page is appended...

Archived Comments, replied by Hey there stranger @ Mon, 23 Apr 2007 14:18:26 -0500

Hey there stranger — Mon, 23 Apr 2007 14:18:26 -0500

Great job, guys! :)