Discussion on User Scripts Search Sorting - With Install Rate | Userscripts.org

Archived Comments, replied by JoeSimmons @ Tue, 28 Oct 2008 19:26:16 -0500

JoeSimmons — Tue, 28 Oct 2008 19:26:16 -0500

It's now sorting by fans not install count.

Archived Comments, replied by w35l3y @ Thu, 09 Oct 2008 14:52:28 -0500

w35l3y — Thu, 09 Oct 2008 14:52:28 -0500

Change:

date = scripts[i].getElementsByTagName('created-at')[0].textContent.replace(/[T:Z]/g, "-").split("-");
days = Math.ceil(new Date(new Date() - new Date(date[0], date[1]-1, date[2], date[3], date[4], date[5], 0).getTime()) / (24*60*60*1000));

To:

date = Date.parse(scripts[i].getElementsByTagName('created-at')[0].textContent.replace(/[TZ]/g,' ').replace(/-/g,'/'));
days = Math.max(Math.ceil((new Date() - date) / (24*60*60*1000)),1);

Archived Comments, replied by znerp @ Thu, 09 Oct 2008 14:15:34 -0500

znerp — Thu, 09 Oct 2008 14:15:34 -0500

Well I've tried this on a XP and Vista, ff2 and ff3, and I can't seem to replicate this problem. So to be honest, I really don't know what I can do about this.

Archived Comments, replied by avg @ Thu, 09 Oct 2008 13:54:57 -0500

avg — Thu, 09 Oct 2008 13:54:57 -0500

this happens with me as well... if there is a script with 0 installs, the rate for that is messed up, and consequently, the total rate shows up as NaN (not a number)

Archived Comments, replied by znerp @ Thu, 09 Oct 2008 13:27:09 -0500

znerp — Thu, 09 Oct 2008 13:27:09 -0500

Ok, I've just created a test script and immediately checked back to my scripts page. It showed up as (0/day).

You're not being particulatrly helpful here ... does this only happen for you for scripts with zero installs, or can you see if there's some threshold time whereby it will appear as NaN/day before this time, and 0/day after this time?

Archived Comments, replied by JoeSimmons @ Thu, 09 Oct 2008 13:03:08 -0500

JoeSimmons — Thu, 09 Oct 2008 13:03:08 -0500

http://i37.tinypic.com/20aow35.png

Archived Comments, replied by znerp @ Tue, 07 Oct 2008 02:23:46 -0500

znerp — Tue, 07 Oct 2008 02:23:46 -0500

Well you're going to have to give me more details than that, Joe.

I've looked at your scripts, and the one I think you might be referring to (2 hours old, zero installs) is showing up as (0/day). If you give me some way of replicating this problem I might be able to fix it.

Archived Comments, replied by JoeSimmons @ Tue, 07 Oct 2008 00:25:38 -0500

JoeSimmons — Tue, 07 Oct 2008 00:25:38 -0500

(NaN/day)
Please fix this. It's putting the scripts that aren't even a day old up at the top of the sorting list.

Archived Comments, replied by znerp @ Thu, 02 Oct 2008 02:22:43 -0500

znerp — Thu, 02 Oct 2008 02:22:43 -0500

@JoeSimmons: That's my bad, I guess I hadn't tested it with users with multiple pages of scripts. It should work now, but it will only calculate overall rates (at the top of the table) for one page at a time. Same for sorting.

Archived Comments, replied by JoeSimmons @ Wed, 01 Oct 2008 21:24:35 -0500

JoeSimmons — Wed, 01 Oct 2008 21:24:35 -0500

I'm getting this error on my own scripts...

Error: scriptsTable.getElementsByTagName("tr")[j + 1] is undefined

It says greasemonkey.js is the source, not your script. I know it is though because I can disable it and the error goes away.

Archived Comments, replied by steeev @ Fri, 06 Jun 2008 09:36:34 -0500

steeev — Fri, 06 Jun 2008 09:36:34 -0500

cool script! thanks! :)

Archived Comments, replied by znerp @ Fri, 28 Mar 2008 03:23:13 -0500

znerp — Fri, 28 Mar 2008 03:23:13 -0500

@ekbworldwide: I'm looking at your scripts and I'm not expriencing any problems. Have you noticed this with any other users scripts?

Archived Comments, replied by ekbworldwide @ Fri, 28 Mar 2008 02:02:21 -0500

ekbworldwide — Fri, 28 Mar 2008 02:02:21 -0500

Bug?

I have two scripts...

ekbworldwide's scripts – Userscripts.org
http://userscripts.org/users/39581/scripts

.. but only one showed up when I used an old version of your script. I just upgraded a few minutes ago - the problem persists. If I use the ff add-on IE tab - or disable your script - both scripts are visible.

Archived Comments, replied by mugzy @ Thu, 18 Oct 2007 09:02:13 -0500

mugzy — Thu, 18 Oct 2007 09:02:13 -0500

Not working for me, here is the error from firebug.

scriptRows.getElementsByTagName("p")[2] has no properties
file:///C:/.../gm_scripts/userscriptssearchsorting.user.js
Line 50

and

scriptsTable has no properties
file:///C:/.../gm_scripts/userscriptssearchsorting.user.js
Line 47

Archived Comments, replied by pandaking @ Wed, 03 Oct 2007 14:28:35 -0500

pandaking — Wed, 03 Oct 2007 14:28:35 -0500

Not working for me?!

Archived Comments, replied by znerp @ Wed, 26 Sep 2007 08:12:11 -0500

znerp — Wed, 26 Sep 2007 08:12:11 -0500

@norz: I don't know why this should be; it works fine for me. Is anyone else experiencing problems?

Archived Comments, replied by norz @ Thu, 20 Sep 2007 11:07:37 -0500

norz — Thu, 20 Sep 2007 11:07:37 -0500

Couldn't make it work properly: I didn't see any extra links in the table headers, whereas I got them with the original script.
I see the nb of installs/day in the rows, though.

Archived Comments, replied by znerp @ Fri, 14 Sep 2007 05:46:28 -0500

znerp — Fri, 14 Sep 2007 05:46:28 -0500

@FryGuy: Glad you like the script, but I can't seem to replicate the bug you described. Can you give me specific details of such an example (the install count, how long ago a script was created and in what context you're viewing the script, ie. in a search, in a user's scripts etc.)

Archived Comments, replied by FryGuy @ Thu, 13 Sep 2007 10:45:50 -0500

FryGuy — Thu, 13 Sep 2007 10:45:50 -0500

Good script!
Bug: if the script was developed today, it shows the message 'NaN installs/day'

Archived Comments, replied by deodrus @ Wed, 16 May 2007 16:34:31 -0500

deodrus — Wed, 16 May 2007 16:34:31 -0500

Another AWESOME script. Thank you very much!! This is one of the first things I looked for on userscripts. (^_^)

Archived Comments, replied by Jesse Andrews @ Tue, 16 Nov 2004 19:06:04 -0600

Jesse Andrews — Tue, 16 Nov 2004 19:06:04 -0600

The following is an archive of comments made before threaded discussions was implemented (November 16th, 2008)