Discussion on Digg Nested Comments | Userscripts.org

Archived Comments, replied by pile0nades @ Mon, 28 May 2007 12:01:49 -0500

pile0nades — Mon, 28 May 2007 12:01:49 -0500

Bug fixed. Just noticed it myself on http://digg.com/world_news/Rare_Footage_of_Flig...

The fix was as simple as changing "ol;" to "ol = false" in a for loop.

Archived Comments, replied by Nougat @ Wed, 23 May 2007 16:19:29 -0500

Nougat — Wed, 23 May 2007 16:19:29 -0500

Whoops, new problem. Seems that all of the replies are nested under one comment, instead of under the comments they're supposed to be under.

See here:

http://digg.com/offbeat_news/God_smites_statue_...

Archived Comments, replied by Nougat @ Wed, 23 May 2007 09:01:59 -0500

Nougat — Wed, 23 May 2007 09:01:59 -0500

Oh sorry, my carriage return comment made no sense.

Adding a carriage return between the @username (#xxxxxx) and the start of entering your message might make the output cleaner, especially for those not using this script.

Archived Comments, replied by Nougat @ Wed, 23 May 2007 09:00:34 -0500

Nougat — Wed, 23 May 2007 09:00:34 -0500

Bug fixed - great!

Archived Comments, replied by Nougat @ Wed, 09 May 2007 15:03:07 -0500

Nougat — Wed, 09 May 2007 15:03:07 -0500

Having the script add a carriage return between the @username (#xxxxxx) might make messages less cluttered and more readable to those who aren't using this script.

Archived Comments, replied by Nougat @ Wed, 09 May 2007 09:47:48 -0500

Nougat — Wed, 09 May 2007 09:47:48 -0500

@Babcock: it's not that intrusive, really.

Also, yes, I am still seeing the same symptoms I originally reported with the new script installed.

Archived Comments, replied by violentvinyl @ Tue, 08 May 2007 23:10:15 -0500

violentvinyl — Tue, 08 May 2007 23:10:15 -0500

I'm still seeing the same bug Nougat posted.

Archived Comments, replied by Cailean Babcock @ Tue, 08 May 2007 21:57:55 -0500

Cailean Babcock — Tue, 08 May 2007 21:57:55 -0500

It's a great idea, but unfortunately, really annoying for non-Grease-Monkey users. Instead of traction, it's building irritation. Why not just make a feature request to the Digg admins? It seems like a good preference option, and would work better if incorporated into the system, rather than just adding random numbers to people's posts (hint: it's only pretty if you're using it.)

Archived Comments, replied by Nougat @ Wed, 11 Apr 2007 13:53:44 -0500

Nougat — Wed, 11 Apr 2007 13:53:44 -0500

Let's say I reply to a top level comment. Then other people reply *after* I do. My reply is shown at the *end* of the list of replies to that top level comment, and if someone else who's not using this script replies *to* me *after* me, then their reply is shown *before* mine.

It's a tad confusing. But I love this script and I will continue to use it happily. I comment a lot, and I think people are starting to notice the comment numbers in the posts, so you might be getting some traction soon.

Archived Comments, replied by Sami Samhuri @ Thu, 29 Mar 2007 02:50:19 -0500

Sami Samhuri — Thu, 29 Mar 2007 02:50:19 -0500

It should arrive in your inbox shortly.

Archived Comments, replied by pile0nades @ Wed, 28 Mar 2007 08:25:16 -0500

pile0nades — Wed, 28 Mar 2007 08:25:16 -0500

Could you send me the [quote] changes at pile0nades__@__gmail__.__com (remove underscores)?

Archived Comments, replied by Sami Samhuri @ Mon, 26 Mar 2007 01:21:31 -0500

Sami Samhuri — Mon, 26 Mar 2007 01:21:31 -0500

I modified your script to add [quote] links as well (20 lines). If you're interested in the changes let me know and I'll send them to you somehow.

I like yours better so I am using it now. It's faster. :)

Archived Comments, replied by Sami Samhuri @ Mon, 26 Mar 2007 00:51:14 -0500

Sami Samhuri — Mon, 26 Mar 2007 00:51:14 -0500

Ok well this is something I had wanted to do, so thanks!

I was trying similar stuff here: http://userscripts.org/scripts/show/7860

but your code is much leaner. Well done.

Archived Comments, replied by pile0nades @ Sat, 24 Mar 2007 19:33:52 -0500

pile0nades — Sat, 24 Mar 2007 19:33:52 -0500

You're right about that, so I've updated the script to use the format "@username (#xxxxxx)" which looks much better. This is what people without the script will see. The number will be hidden when it is linkified so just the @username is visible.

Archived Comments, replied by Derrek @ Sun, 18 Mar 2007 17:29:53 -0500

Derrek — Sun, 18 Mar 2007 17:29:53 -0500

This is a great idea, however digg users have their own way of doing it. @username

so I was thinking instead of inserting >>xxxxxx for everyone to see just replace the post with the user name.

I'm just wondering if people will find the linked numbers annoying... maybe you can keep it linking back to the post just replace the text.

Archived Comments, replied by Jesse Andrews @ Tue, 16 Nov 2004 19:05:19 -0600

Jesse Andrews — Tue, 16 Nov 2004 19:05:19 -0600

The following is an archive of comments made before threaded discussions was implemented (November 16th, 2008)