<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>Discussion on Addons Crap Remover | Userscripts.org</title>
    <link>http://userscripts.org/scripts/show/6509</link>
    <description>Recent comments on userscript: Addons Crap Remover</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <ttl>60</ttl>
    <item>
      <title>Archived Comments, replied by Mathemajor</title>
      <description>&lt;p&gt;I did it! I've posted an updated version of this script available &lt;a href=&quot;http://userscripts.org/scripts/show/25916&quot;&gt;here&lt;/a&gt;. The script is currently unlisted for some reason, but I have contacted the admins to hopefully change that.&lt;/p&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Sat, 03 May 2008 21:52:49 +0000</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">userscripts.org:13017:39505</guid>
      <author>Mathemajor</author>
      <link>http://userscripts.org/posts/39505</link>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Archived Comments, replied by Mathemajor</title>
      <description>&lt;p&gt;This script was awesome. Any chance there will be an update for the new AMO layout?&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;I'll attempt to update it myself...could be a fun first script on US!&lt;/p&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Sun, 20 Apr 2008 03:30:05 +0000</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">userscripts.org:13017:39506</guid>
      <author>Mathemajor</author>
      <link>http://userscripts.org/posts/39506</link>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Archived Comments, replied by sharmard</title>
      <description>&lt;p&gt;Once again, AMO has been revised and has pulled the rug out from under this script.&lt;/p&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 27 Mar 2008 14:35:14 +0000</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">userscripts.org:13017:39507</guid>
      <author>sharmard</author>
      <link>http://userscripts.org/posts/39507</link>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Archived Comments, replied by Mathemajor</title>
      <description>&lt;p&gt;I have been looking for a script like this for a long time now, thank you!&lt;/p&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Sun, 09 Mar 2008 22:35:42 +0000</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">userscripts.org:13017:39508</guid>
      <author>Mathemajor</author>
      <link>http://userscripts.org/posts/39508</link>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Archived Comments, replied by sharmard</title>
      <description>&lt;p&gt;Many thanks.  It works great.&lt;/p&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Tue, 10 Apr 2007 14:12:17 +0000</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">userscripts.org:13017:39509</guid>
      <author>sharmard</author>
      <link>http://userscripts.org/posts/39509</link>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Archived Comments, replied by JohnM</title>
      <description>&lt;p&gt;sharmard: Its now updated to work with the new AMO&lt;/p&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Mon, 09 Apr 2007 15:16:27 +0000</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">userscripts.org:13017:39510</guid>
      <author>JohnM</author>
      <link>http://userscripts.org/posts/39510</link>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Archived Comments, replied by sharmard</title>
      <description>&lt;p&gt;It looks like the new AMO look and feel has broken this script.  Any plans to upgrade it?&lt;/p&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Mon, 02 Apr 2007 14:51:51 +0000</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">userscripts.org:13017:39511</guid>
      <author>sharmard</author>
      <link>http://userscripts.org/posts/39511</link>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Archived Comments, replied by sharmard</title>
      <description>&lt;p&gt;And while I am it (off topic), does anybody know why my punctuation marks propagate to the published comments as their encoded decimal equivalents?  I seem to have this trouble on some sites, no trouble on others.&lt;/p&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Wed, 17 Jan 2007 16:52:50 +0000</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">userscripts.org:13017:39512</guid>
      <author>sharmard</author>
      <link>http://userscripts.org/posts/39512</link>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Archived Comments, replied by sharmard</title>
      <description>&lt;p&gt;Thanks for the reply, JohnM.  Yes, I&#8217;m trying to restore something I removed using a red x.  When I look at the entry in about:config, I don&#8217;t see a value.  I know it should be there, but the string value is empty.  It&#8217;s possible there&#8217;s a conflict with another script or extension that&#8217;s getting in the way.  I do notice that if I change the options for the TargetAlert extension, ACR variously does or does not recognize previously-marked extensions.  I&#8217;m assuming that it stores the specifics of the hyperlink for each, and TargetAlert probably modifies that.  Anyway, back to the main point &#8212; any ideas on why I can&#8217;t see the string value in about:config or another alternative for editing the list?&lt;/p&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Wed, 17 Jan 2007 16:51:01 +0000</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">userscripts.org:13017:39513</guid>
      <author>sharmard</author>
      <link>http://userscripts.org/posts/39513</link>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Archived Comments, replied by JohnM</title>
      <description>&lt;p&gt;If its something you removed using the red x, you can modify the preference this script saves. I'm sorry I didn't make an easier way to do it. They are in a preference with the name greasemonkey.scriptvals.&lt;a href=&quot;http://addons.mozilla.org/userscript/Addons&quot;&gt;http://addons.mozilla.org/userscript/Addons&lt;/a&gt; Crap Remover.bad_titles
&lt;br /&gt;The value should be a line separated list(as a string its \n, but it might appear as a dot in the about:config window) Just remove the title of the extension from the value to show it again.&lt;/p&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Tue, 16 Jan 2007 22:22:09 +0000</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">userscripts.org:13017:39514</guid>
      <author>JohnM</author>
      <link>http://userscripts.org/posts/39514</link>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Archived Comments, replied by sharmard</title>
      <description>&lt;p&gt;This is a great script which solved a particular pet peeve of mine &#8212; I couldn&#8217;t easily tell which extensions were new posts because of the clutter.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;I&#8217;m wondering, though, if there&#8217;s a way to remove an addon from the list?  I tagged an addon I later decided I wanted to see.  I know I can get the full list back if I want, but what I&#8217;d like to do is remove a specific addon from the list.  What&#8217;s the easiest way to do this (I am admittedly not a GS expert)?&lt;/p&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Mon, 15 Jan 2007 16:08:06 +0000</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">userscripts.org:13017:39515</guid>
      <author>sharmard</author>
      <link>http://userscripts.org/posts/39515</link>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Archived Comments, replied by LouCypher</title>
      <description>&lt;p&gt;I hate those conduits@amo. But really, I never thought of using GM script to get rid of them. Good work, John.&lt;/p&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 04 Jan 2007 03:47:01 +0000</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">userscripts.org:13017:39516</guid>
      <author>LouCypher</author>
      <link>http://userscripts.org/posts/39516</link>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Archived Comments, replied by JohnM</title>
      <description>&lt;p&gt;It should be persistent. It saves the extensions removed with the red x in a preference and reads from those and adds it to the bad_titles array when it is loaded.
&lt;br /&gt;It saves to greasemonkey.scriptvals.&lt;a href=&quot;http://addons.mozilla.org/userscript/Addons&quot;&gt;http://addons.mozilla.org/userscript/Addons&lt;/a&gt; Crap Remover.bad_titles&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;It works for me, but if it doesn't for you, you  can always add it manually.&lt;/p&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Sun, 17 Dec 2006 19:57:24 +0000</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">userscripts.org:13017:39517</guid>
      <author>JohnM</author>
      <link>http://userscripts.org/posts/39517</link>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Archived Comments, replied by theaulddubliner</title>
      <description>&lt;p&gt;Good update - esp the change to the bad_titles array.  Is the red x removal function supposed to be persistent [as it is not for me] ?&lt;/p&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Sun, 17 Dec 2006 07:16:11 +0000</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">userscripts.org:13017:39518</guid>
      <author>theaulddubliner</author>
      <link>http://userscripts.org/posts/39518</link>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Archived Comments, replied by JohnM</title>
      <description>&lt;p&gt;Updated:
&lt;br /&gt;-Highlights removed extensions when toggled to Show the hidden extenions(Clicking the red text at the top toggles it)
&lt;br /&gt;-Adds a red x to remove an extension
&lt;br /&gt;-Adds a has: operator to the BAD_TITLES array in the code, for example, has:Toolbar would remove any extension with Toolbar in the title&lt;/p&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Sat, 16 Dec 2006 21:23:08 +0000</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">userscripts.org:13017:39519</guid>
      <author>JohnM</author>
      <link>http://userscripts.org/posts/39519</link>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Archived Comments, replied by theaulddubliner</title>
      <description>&lt;p&gt;Well I have added almost anything that has the word 'toolbar' in it and those extensions that seem to update twice a day just to stay at the top of the list. You've done the hard work - probably best left to the user to decide what to filter.&lt;/p&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Tue, 28 Nov 2006 01:38:14 +0000</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">userscripts.org:13017:39520</guid>
      <author>theaulddubliner</author>
      <link>http://userscripts.org/posts/39520</link>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Archived Comments, replied by JohnM</title>
      <description>&lt;p&gt;If you tell me things I missed I can update the script to include those extensions.&lt;/p&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Mon, 27 Nov 2006 03:21:16 +0000</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">userscripts.org:13017:39521</guid>
      <author>JohnM</author>
      <link>http://userscripts.org/posts/39521</link>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Archived Comments, replied by theaulddubliner</title>
      <description>&lt;p&gt;Absolutely fantastic&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;I've added loads more to the script - makes amo almost usable again&lt;/p&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Sun, 26 Nov 2006 19:39:42 +0000</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">userscripts.org:13017:39522</guid>
      <author>theaulddubliner</author>
      <link>http://userscripts.org/posts/39522</link>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Archived Comments, replied by Jesse Andrews</title>
      <description>&lt;p&gt;The following is an archive of comments made before threaded discussions was implemented (November 16th, 2008)&lt;/p&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Wed, 17 Nov 2004 01:05:06 +0000</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">userscripts.org:13017:39504</guid>
      <author>Jesse Andrews</author>
      <link>http://userscripts.org/posts/39504</link>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>
