<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>Discussion on Auto-Fill Delicious.com v5's Tag Field | Userscripts.org</title>
    <link>http://userscripts.org/scripts/show/37076</link>
    <description>Recent comments on userscript: Auto-Fill Delicious.com v5's Tag Field</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <ttl>60</ttl>
    <item>
      <title>Delicious v5 tag clobbering, replied by Ezekiel Sikelianos</title>
      <description>&lt;p&gt;I made your change and it works like a charm. Good call!&lt;/p&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Wed, 16 Sep 2009 06:44:36 +0000</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">userscripts.org:27804:169352</guid>
      <author>Ezekiel Sikelianos</author>
      <link>http://userscripts.org/posts/169352</link>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Delicious v5 tag clobbering, replied by Gawain</title>
      <description>&lt;p&gt;Howdy,&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;This userscript is great, and really useful for use with delicious bookmarklets etc. My one quibble with it is for the situation in which there is an existing bookmark with tags, in which case the existing tags get clobbered by the ones in the query string (I think?).&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;Would you consider changing the default behaviour to be non-clobbering (I think this is just changing the 'if (qparams[k] &amp;amp;&amp;amp; field)' test to be 'if (qparams[k] &amp;amp;&amp;amp; field &amp;amp;&amp;amp; ! field.value)')?&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;This is much nicer for the use case I've got in mind, but I'm not sure if it might break things for the way other people are using it?&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;Thoughts?&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;Cheers,
&lt;br /&gt;Gawain&lt;/p&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Fri, 29 May 2009 13:04:32 +0000</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">userscripts.org:27804:126975</guid>
      <author>Gawain</author>
      <link>http://userscripts.org/posts/126975</link>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>
