Discussion on Gmail Colorizer | Userscripts.org

Archived Comments, replied by Kay @ Mon, 19 May 2008 16:26:36 -0500

Kay — Mon, 19 May 2008 16:26:36 -0500

It works with the older version but i'd like to see this work with the new gmail as well. i love this script!

any chance of an update ? x2

Archived Comments, replied by Stuart Axon @ Thu, 20 Dec 2007 07:35:59 -0600

Stuart Axon — Thu, 20 Dec 2007 07:35:59 -0600

This seems to have stopped working, any chance of an update ?

Archived Comments, replied by Peyman Emamian @ Sun, 30 Sep 2007 23:49:01 -0500

Peyman Emamian — Sun, 30 Sep 2007 23:49:01 -0500

to set you own colors for labels do this :
replace "SetupStyles" function with code below:
function SetupStyles(){
var strStyle = '';
for(var i=0;i<_arrlabels>
{
for ( j in myArray)
if( myArray[j][0] == _arrLabels[i]) {
strStyle += '.gm_label' + i + ' { background-color: ' + myArray[j][1] + '; }\n';
break;
}
}
addGlobalStyle(strStyle);
}

and in the first lines of script make and array like this :
myArray = [
["label1","#ff00ff"]
,[label2,"color2"]
];
--------
this will do the work.

Archived Comments, replied by Harsh Shah @ Thu, 10 May 2007 14:20:54 -0500

Harsh Shah — Thu, 10 May 2007 14:20:54 -0500

Really great script!! I have been using it for months, and the only problem I have found is whenever I open my Gmail from a browser that does not have this script installed (i.e. IE7 or FF on other PCs), the labels show up as label#colorcode, which is quite ugly to look at. I see that lots of ppl have this problem. I have a dirty hack around this: change the function getLabelColorInfo() to following:
switch (rawLabelName) {
case "Label1":
return {name: rawLabelName, color: "#009999"};
break;
"#0000FF"};
case "Label2":
return {name: rawLabelName, color: "#FF6100"};
break;
case "Label3":
return {name: rawLabelName, color: "#C7AE75"};
where label1, label2 etc are *your* labels. Note that this will be highly user specific, and will need to be updated if one wants to add a color coded label. However, if you are like me, then you have already set up lots of labels, and hardly need to make changes to them.

Just my 2 cents...

One question though: is it possible to color code the label "inbox" when viewing archived folder??

Thanks

Archived Comments, replied by Dee @ Tue, 10 Apr 2007 16:29:06 -0500

Dee — Tue, 10 Apr 2007 16:29:06 -0500

If it matters, I'm using Firefox 2.0.0.3 on Windows XP. I don't know what version of greasemonkey it is, but I just downloaded it a couple of days ago.

Archived Comments, replied by Dee @ Tue, 10 Apr 2007 16:25:25 -0500

Dee — Tue, 10 Apr 2007 16:25:25 -0500

It worked! I added labels in one of my gmail accounts. Unfortunately, the "# color" shows up as part of the label.

But worse, when I went to another gmail account, where I had added no colorization to labels, I found that three labels had been colorized three arbitrary colors! I don't know how to change them since they have no color designation in their labels.

Please, help.

TIA.

Archived Comments, replied by artprod @ Thu, 11 Jan 2007 04:42:07 -0600

artprod — Thu, 11 Jan 2007 04:42:07 -0600

Thanks a lot, the script is very efficient. However, when GMail refreshs automatically the page to check for new mail incoming, labels disappear and the name of label with hex color code appears.
Second, is it possible to keep the label color when mail is open instead of "name of label #color"
(FF1.5+Greasemonkey 0.6.4)

Archived Comments, replied by ckilgore @ Fri, 08 Dec 2006 21:28:38 -0600

ckilgore — Fri, 08 Dec 2006 21:28:38 -0600

It works great - makes my inbox a lot clearer, but I had the same problems as csw (I think). I can change the colors hex values on the script, but it doesn't ever show up differently in gmail. Very odd.

Archived Comments, replied by csw @ Tue, 07 Nov 2006 06:01:25 -0600

csw — Tue, 07 Nov 2006 06:01:25 -0600

I can't change any of the label's colors!! sux please help?!

Archived Comments, replied by Alphabool @ Sun, 22 Oct 2006 19:33:32 -0500

Alphabool — Sun, 22 Oct 2006 19:33:32 -0500

I love this - I only wish it worked with the Gmail CSS RL Skin

Archived Comments, replied by mar 1 @ Thu, 17 Aug 2006 17:01:35 -0500

mar 1 — Thu, 17 Aug 2006 17:01:35 -0500

Could you please make the script compatible with this cool CSS?

http://userstyles.org/style/show/77#comments

Archived Comments, replied by Alejandro Matos @ Thu, 20 Jul 2006 08:02:00 -0500

Alejandro Matos — Thu, 20 Jul 2006 08:02:00 -0500

Somehow, I don't get emails colorized when I get more than one tag per email:

email A: one tag ==> colorized
email B: two tags ==> not colorized

Is this a bug?

Archived Comments, replied by jabba @ Mon, 26 Dec 2005 16:12:07 -0600

jabba — Mon, 26 Dec 2005 16:12:07 -0600

I love the script so much that I keep coming back for some more punishment. This time, I did some bug hunting. Here is what I discovered.
The problems that I was talking about were due to the number of conversations I had set up. When showing 100 at the time, the script goes crazy and pegs the CPU to the max. 50 helps a lot but still shows some activity and 25 acts normal. I would like to be able to at least see 50 at the time. Crashes that I had before were always when clicking on a label. With 100 at the time, FF crashes almost immediately, 50 and 25 no crashes so far but increased CPU activity. It would probably crash if I leave it to stay like that for a while.
I hope this will help you in debugging the code, I really love the script and wanna see it bug free. You can email me if for more info. I'll be glad to help out.

Archived Comments, replied by Tom Lee @ Mon, 12 Dec 2005 05:35:27 -0600

Tom Lee — Mon, 12 Dec 2005 05:35:27 -0600

I've gotten a few more reports about crashing behavior, but it's far from universal. Right now it looks like it might have more to do with FF1.5 weirdness than the script itself. If I can figure out a way to fix the crashing behavior I will, but at the moment I'm stymied.

Archived Comments, replied by jabba @ Sat, 10 Dec 2005 22:01:50 -0600

jabba — Sat, 10 Dec 2005 22:01:50 -0600

I'm pretty sure it's the script. My concern was that it could have been the combination of scripts and extension. I uninstalled all of them and installed just the greasemonkey with the colorizer. It happened again. So if nobody else complains it could be just me, it could be FF for OSX or it could be something else. I just know that the problems disappear when I'm not using this script. Hope that the next version will be easier on my system.

Archived Comments, replied by Tom Lee @ Thu, 08 Dec 2005 11:35:00 -0600

Tom Lee — Thu, 08 Dec 2005 11:35:00 -0600

Are you sure it's the script? It's possible, I suppose (although it's more likely to be a bug in FF's javascript implementation -- the script doesn't do anything too fancy). If you've really isolated it to the script, I'd like to know. Gotta be sure, though.

I'm planning on making some interface improvements over the next week or two (basically a color picker and color assigner dialog). I'll try to come up with a more efficient way for the script to fire (rather than a timer) at the same time.

Archived Comments, replied by jabba @ Wed, 07 Dec 2005 03:18:59 -0600

jabba — Wed, 07 Dec 2005 03:18:59 -0600

I love the script, but it's doing some weird shi on my computer. I'm using FF 1.5 and the script is using 100% of the CPU. If I leave it like that for a while, it crashes the browser. I'm not going to rate it because of that. Oh yeah, I'm using OSX if that means anything.

Archived Comments, replied by Tom Lee @ Thu, 01 Dec 2005 08:57:12 -0600

Tom Lee — Thu, 01 Dec 2005 08:57:12 -0600

Fair enough. I like the current setup -- the bold is enough for me to tell what's unread and what isn't. It wouldn't be hard for you to keep unread rows the default white, however (just remove the part of the xpath query that looks for rows of class 'ur'). I'm hesitant to support different sets of colors for read and unread messages. I'll try to think of a simpler way to switch colors than the current system.

Archived Comments, replied by Tom Lee @ Thu, 01 Dec 2005 08:51:47 -0600

Tom Lee — Thu, 01 Dec 2005 08:51:47 -0600

Archived Comments, replied by Caleb @ Wed, 30 Nov 2005 18:48:03 -0600

Caleb — Wed, 30 Nov 2005 18:48:03 -0600

Nice, but its difficult to tell if the message is read or unread.

Archived Comments, replied by Jesse Andrews @ Tue, 16 Nov 2004 19:05:17 -0600

Jesse Andrews — Tue, 16 Nov 2004 19:05:17 -0600

The following is an archive of comments made before threaded discussions was implemented (November 16th, 2008)