Discussion on Gmail Spam-count Hide | Userscripts.org

Archived Comments, replied by Victor Ly

Victor Ly — Mon, 07 Jul 2008 00:06:23 +0000

Please update this script to work with the current Gmail interface. Thanks.

Archived Comments, replied by leafduo

leafduo — Thu, 17 Apr 2008 15:45:06 +0000

not work now

Archived Comments, replied by Arend

Arend — Mon, 11 Feb 2008 20:00:14 +0000

I've temporarily uploaded my suggested fix (see comment below) as a userscript:
http://userscripts.org/scripts/show/22660

You can try that until the main script is updated.

Archived Comments, replied by Gangles

Gangles — Mon, 04 Feb 2008 00:31:16 +0000

I appreciate the link, but I'm hoping you won't mind directing it to my new domain instead: http://gangles.ca/?p=63

Archived Comments, replied by joey3002

joey3002 — Tue, 29 Jan 2008 16:55:28 +0000

Where do I find my spam id in the source? I'll gladly assist with getting this fixed..

Archived Comments, replied by Rob Wilkerson

Rob Wilkerson — Mon, 28 Jan 2008 21:27:28 +0000

@Daniel - I swear it was working for me earlier on my XP machine at the office, but you're right. It's not working now that I'm home on my Mac nor is it working on my PC any longer.

Arend's change seems to work for me on both the Mac and PC. I have no idea what happened between this morning and now, but my apologies for any confusion.

Archived Comments, replied by Arend

Arend — Mon, 28 Jan 2008 17:34:06 +0000

@daniel
Here's my try. Pretty ugly, but it seems to work:
div.ybaOyc>div>div+div+div+div+div+div+div.ACpQre div.PQmvpb span

With this the spam count is shown again when you are in Spam view. Delete the .ACpQre part, if you don't like this.

Archived Comments, replied by daniel Rozenberg

daniel Rozenberg — Mon, 28 Jan 2008 16:51:25 +0000

@Rob - Your fix didn't work for me, my Spam link's ID is 1f8p - and div[id^="1f8"] is too generic, it hides all the navigation links... I'd be glad if anyone with FireBug and some free time would check their spam link's ID, and the ID of the element(s) above. That might help me find a CSS rule that will work for everyone

Archived Comments, replied by Rob Wilkerson

Rob Wilkerson — Mon, 28 Jan 2008 15:29:23 +0000

Spurious is right, but now Google has added an ID to make life easier (in the short term):

Replace

#ds_spam b,div[id$="^s"] span

with

div[id="1f8q"] span

Don't forget that it needs to be replaced twice. It seems to be working for me.

Archived Comments, replied by spurious

spurious — Sat, 26 Jan 2008 14:51:33 +0000

This no longer works.

Archived Comments, replied by hebbet

hebbet — Wed, 28 Nov 2007 21:02:37 +0000

Maybe you can help me. Hide Spam Count breaks a thing in my Blue Gmail Skin http://pascal.herbert.googlepages.com/bluegmail...

If there are Spams and your script is installed, the background is not it should be.

Archived Comments, replied by Gina Trapani

Gina Trapani — Mon, 26 Nov 2007 18:07:25 +0000

Woo-hoo! Thanks for getting this updated. Just included it in Better Gmail 2--thanks again!

http://ginatrapani.org/workshop/firefox/betterg...

Archived Comments, replied by Paul Irish

Paul Irish — Mon, 26 Nov 2007 02:46:57 +0000

thanks for the update!

Archived Comments, replied by Rob Wilkerson

Rob Wilkerson — Tue, 20 Nov 2007 17:22:08 +0000

Brilliant! Thanks for the effort.

Archived Comments, replied by V Dumont

V Dumont — Tue, 20 Nov 2007 13:54:54 +0000

Thank you Arend, your fix work!

Archived Comments, replied by Arend

Arend — Mon, 19 Nov 2007 18:37:38 +0000

The following fix works for me:
Replace (twice)
span[title^="Spam ("]
with
div[id$="^s"] span

The stylish code relies on the id starting with 1f9t. That is not always the case. The id-prefix changes sometimes.

Archived Comments, replied by daniel Rozenberg

daniel Rozenberg — Sat, 17 Nov 2007 19:11:34 +0000

Google are constantly changing GMail's code, which makes it hard to fix this script... In a few days I'll look again at GMail to see if the changes appear to stop... :)

Archived Comments, replied by Holliday

Holliday — Sat, 17 Nov 2007 17:22:31 +0000

But I don't want them marked read...
Could someone please update the script again, I miss it.

Archived Comments, replied by Gangles

Gangles — Fri, 16 Nov 2007 17:58:21 +0000

While I love this script, you *can* actually mark spam messages as read using the Gmail filter system:

http://quixotic-engineer.blogspot.com/2007/11/g...

Archived Comments, replied by Indros

Indros — Fri, 16 Nov 2007 15:10:11 +0000

And then it randomly stopped working. Ack!

Archived Comments, replied by Indros

Indros — Tue, 13 Nov 2007 19:47:02 +0000

I installed the script today in FF 2.0.0.9 on Mac OS X 10.4.10. I have Better Gmail 2.0 installed as well with all but the Message Details option checked.

So far, it works perfectly as I navigate through Gmail, refresh Gmail, or even restart Firefox.

Archived Comments, replied by Frank Yan

Frank Yan — Sat, 10 Nov 2007 16:56:03 +0000

GMail changed its code yet again! I guess those google guys are still perfecting their new interface. what a pain for us script-writers, but improvement is good for users :)

Archived Comments, replied by Rob Wilkerson

Rob Wilkerson — Fri, 09 Nov 2007 18:43:32 +0000

So here's what I've noticed. I open Gmail and the spam count is not hidden. Gmail sits a while (don't know how long, at this point) and at some point I look back and the count is hidden. I hit 'F5' and the count is back when the page is reloaded.

I don't know quite what to make of that yet, but when I can dedicate some time, I might try to sort out what's going on.

Archived Comments, replied by daniel Rozenberg

daniel Rozenberg — Fri, 09 Nov 2007 16:36:21 +0000

@Gina and @Rob... It currently works for me, but we might have different versions of the new version... If any of you would like to help me figure out how to fix this for all, email me (my email is in the script's code)

Archived Comments, replied by Rob Wilkerson

Rob Wilkerson — Fri, 09 Nov 2007 13:36:59 +0000

@Gina -

It's not working for me at the moment either, but I installed the script yesterday and could *swear* that it worked for me initially.