Discussion on Because it's your userscripts.org | Userscripts.org

Bugs in version 2.0? Please post here, replied by pw

pw — Sat, 14 Nov 2009 03:01:32 +0000

If you find any bugs in the latest version, please post them as replies to this topic, which I shall be watching carefully!

includes missing /tags, replied by IzzySoft

IzzySoft — Wed, 11 Nov 2009 13:45:55 +0000

Hi pw,

just a small suggestion: you may want to @include http://userscripts.org/tags/* as well with the script, since that's a subset of the /scripts page (something like a special variant of /scripts/search). Seems to work fine there, I tried

Height, replied by ozzii

ozzii — Mon, 09 Nov 2009 13:01:10 +0000

Thanks for your work.

Height, replied by pw

pw — Mon, 09 Nov 2009 04:25:17 +0000

My next version (in progress) will allow expanding and collapsing pieces of the menu, so that should not be a problem any more. (And the 'Apply Changes' button will be at the top!).

Height, replied by ozzii

ozzii — Sat, 07 Nov 2009 11:40:57 +0000

Hello,
can you make the show BIYUS with a max height and a overflow:auto because on may laptop, I can't see all the options because it's moving with the page.
So I can't do changes !!

Thanks.

Icons for Hide by Title/Descriptions gone?, replied by IzzySoft

IzzySoft — Fri, 06 Nov 2009 05:22:51 +0000

Great! Thanx again - I'm looking forward to the next update eagerly

Icons for Hide by Title/Descriptions gone?, replied by pw

pw — Thu, 05 Nov 2009 20:00:57 +0000

Editing rejected terms is on my todo list! It would be pretty easy to put those icons back; I moved that functionality into the menu because it's not script-specific, unlike the icons which remain, but I'm all for ease of use, so I'll think about restoring them.

Icons for Hide by Title/Descriptions gone?, replied by IzzySoft

IzzySoft — Thu, 05 Nov 2009 18:04:34 +0000

Yes, I saw this. But the icons had one very big advantage: Imagine I see scripts using "foreign" character sets like Chinese or Russian. To enter those in the new text boxes, it requires some copy and paste - since not everybody has Chinese support enabled. With the previous "Hide by Title / Description" and the JS popup, this was much easier to handle: Leave it as is (to remove a single script), or delete a part of it (leaving something which seems to be in common by those scripts), and simply click "OK". I'd prefer to have that back, if possible.

The menu of course is very fine as well, and due to that the GM menu is much cleaner now

Except for those icons, the only thing I miss is to list up the terms entered in the past - so one can undo things...

Again: Thank you for the great script, heads up, and get it going!

Icons for Hide by Title/Descriptions gone?, replied by pw

pw — Mon, 26 Oct 2009 16:41:05 +0000

Hi Izzy:

Yes, there are now text boxes in the menu on the left of the page to add terms to discard by title or description.

Style suggestion, replied by IzzySoft

IzzySoft — Mon, 26 Oct 2009 15:52:39 +0000

I included that styling in my UserScripts.Org Compact style, if anyone is interested in that. Thanx for uncluttering the menu, by the way!

Icons for Hide by Title/Descriptions gone?, replied by IzzySoft

IzzySoft — Mon, 26 Oct 2009 10:34:46 +0000

Hi pw,

thanx for the update - a much cleaner UserScript-Commands menu now! But unfortunately, the icons to reject (hide) scripts by title/description are gone now. Was that intended?

Best regards,
Izzy.

Style suggestion, replied by IzzySoft

IzzySoft — Wed, 21 Oct 2009 11:37:53 +0000

I really like the "search filter" to suppress unwanted script entries. And it's a very good thing to have the links right available to add filter terms. Unfortunately, this makes the result pages twice as long - so may I suggest a small style enhancement:

td.script-meat div { display:none !important; }
td.script-meat:hover div { display:block !important; }

This hides the fancy links until the mouse hovers over the corresponding table cell. You could of course add one more toggle, so users are able to easily switch this behavior on/off according to their gusto.

Besides: The list of toggle switches in the users menu got quite large. If one has some more scripts with items here running, it soon gets a bit messy. How about using something like GM_config or GM_config extender to collect most of the items, by default leaving only the call to the config there? As the author of the latter mentioned script, I can of course provide some help

No updates?, replied by pw

pw — Sun, 18 Oct 2009 17:24:45 +0000

Apologies for letting this languish so long; I had moved on to other projects. I've just updated the script to work with the current userscripts site, and added a bit of functionality. I'll keep an eye on responses.

No updates?, replied by sharmard

sharmard — Tue, 11 Aug 2009 14:21:27 +0000

The author hasn't been active on USO in over a year. My guess is that this script is dead unless somebody else picks it up. It's a shame; it's a great concept and was well-executed.

No updates?, replied by ycc2106

ycc2106 — Mon, 10 Aug 2009 19:13:58 +0000

petty... you should either remove it or update it.

Only partially working, replied by sharmard

sharmard — Tue, 12 May 2009 16:06:14 +0000

Now it seems to be almost completely broken. The menu commands are available, but no scripts are removed from the display.

Only partially working, replied by sharmard

sharmard — Mon, 04 May 2009 15:33:12 +0000

I've noticed a few elements are no longer appearing when this script is in play: The trash can for eliminating scripts one by one, and the tally of the number of scripts originally and currently at the top of the page. I presume these changes are due to changes to the USO site, but don't know for sure.

Trash button, replied by ozzii

ozzii — Tue, 23 Dec 2008 05:37:56 +0000

A little Up

Trash button, replied by ozzii

ozzii — Fri, 05 Dec 2008 05:30:18 +0000

Hello,
the trash script button sometimes doesn't do anything.
Ask for a confirmation, and nothing ...
But sometimes, after the confirmation, the script is hide.

Archived Comments, replied by TomG

TomG — Fri, 07 Nov 2008 13:41:04 +0000

Love it, but...:
This adds 14 user script commands. Couldn't there just be a 'Settings' command which brings them up or, at least, name them all 'BIYUS: Name' so that I can more easily find my other script commands?

Archived Comments, replied by pw

pw — Mon, 21 Jul 2008 03:31:05 +0000

The 'include' rejection gives a pass to scripts which passed the include test previously. So, try a right click on the monkey, 'User Script Commands', and clear prior rejects. You're offered options; when asked, clear the array 'goodIncludes'. That should do the trick. Yes, it's a bit "under the hood"!

Archived Comments, replied by sharmard

sharmard — Thu, 12 Jun 2008 16:36:14 +0000

Thanks again for such a great script; I find it useful every single day.

I'm having trouble getting rejection by includes to work. I'm specifically attempting to reject using the include entry "goallineblitz", but it's not rejecting, for example, http://userscripts.org/scripts/show/28327, which has: // @include http://goallineblitz.com/game/*

Archived Comments, replied by pw

pw — Tue, 25 Mar 2008 03:34:21 +0000

Alex, I wish there were, but there's no way, at the moment, for a GreaseMonkey script to read a local file, where the data would be saved. In any event, I think this script may have stabilized, so that that will no longer be a problem.

Archived Comments, replied by alex.

alex. — Mon, 17 Mar 2008 13:14:05 +0000

Is there no way to make the save for upgrade section into a separate script that gets read by the main script when it gets loaded .

I can't remember the number of times I have updated the script without saving the reject arrays.

Archived Comments, replied by neko

neko — Tue, 29 Jan 2008 17:15:49 +0000

thanks to the recent us.o update, this script seems to be completely broken. (it throws up an 'unresponsive script' error and nothing gets filtered)