<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>Discussion on natwest-login | Userscripts.org</title>
    <link>http://userscripts.org/scripts/show/1335</link>
    <description>Recent comments on userscript: natwest-login</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <ttl>60</ttl>
    <item>
      <title>Archived Comments, replied by CarlosP @ Tue, 16 Oct 2007 14:55:05 -0500</title>
      <description>&lt;p&gt;Hi, I just installed your script, it works really well, nice work.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;But, I also just figured out why it is definitely less secure for people to use this script.  The reason is, it opens up vulnerability to &lt;b&gt;keyloggers&lt;/b&gt; which are frequently installed with malware, spyware and other such nasties lurking out there on the web.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;If you have a keylogger that has crept onto your system, and you have installed this script, somebody will be able to remotely record your entire password and PIN code.  If you only type in, for example, the 3rd and 5th characters, then your bank account, and all your precious golden coins, remains safe whatever happens.&lt;/p&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Tue, 16 Oct 2007 14:55:05 -0500</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">userscripts.org:17313:75447</guid>
      <author>CarlosP</author>
      <link>http://userscripts.org/topics/17313</link>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Archived Comments, replied by Fr3d @ Sun, 06 May 2007 16:24:46 -0500</title>
      <description>&lt;p&gt;It doesn't seem to set focus to the input box, which is a little annoying. Otherwise, great script, thanks :D&lt;/p&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Sun, 06 May 2007 16:24:46 -0500</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">userscripts.org:17313:75448</guid>
      <author>Fr3d</author>
      <link>http://userscripts.org/topics/17313</link>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Archived Comments, replied by Alan Hogan @ Mon, 04 Dec 2006 19:02:54 -0600</title>
      <description>&lt;p&gt;Hahahahaha idiots. :) Nice work.&lt;/p&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Mon, 04 Dec 2006 19:02:54 -0600</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">userscripts.org:17313:75449</guid>
      <author>Alan Hogan</author>
      <link>http://userscripts.org/topics/17313</link>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Archived Comments, replied by Nic Ferrier @ Fri, 21 Apr 2006 03:33:30 -0500</title>
      <description>&lt;p&gt;No. It's no more insecure than using the page's password and pin entry.&lt;/p&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Fri, 21 Apr 2006 03:33:30 -0500</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">userscripts.org:17313:75450</guid>
      <author>Nic Ferrier</author>
      <link>http://userscripts.org/topics/17313</link>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Archived Comments, replied by nate 1 @ Fri, 14 Oct 2005 12:07:33 -0500</title>
      <description>&lt;p&gt;would this not be kinda insecure???&lt;/p&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Fri, 14 Oct 2005 12:07:33 -0500</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">userscripts.org:17313:75451</guid>
      <author>nate 1</author>
      <link>http://userscripts.org/topics/17313</link>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Archived Comments, replied by Jesse Andrews @ Tue, 16 Nov 2004 19:05:48 -0600</title>
      <description>&lt;p&gt;The following is an archive of comments made before threaded discussions was implemented (November 16th, 2008)&lt;/p&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Tue, 16 Nov 2004 19:05:48 -0600</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">userscripts.org:17313:75446</guid>
      <author>Jesse Andrews</author>
      <link>http://userscripts.org/topics/17313</link>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>
