<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>Discussion on Screen Userscripts | Userscripts.org</title>
    <link>http://userscripts.org/scripts/show/11388</link>
    <description>Recent comments on userscript: Screen Userscripts</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <ttl>60</ttl>
    <item>
      <title>Archived Comments, replied by simon!</title>
      <description>&lt;p&gt;will you PLEASE update this script!&lt;/p&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Sat, 08 Nov 2008 21:12:38 +0000</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">userscripts.org:14238:49448</guid>
      <author>simon!</author>
      <link>http://userscripts.org/posts/49448</link>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Archived Comments, replied by Max     (-ElectroFox Designs)</title>
      <description>&lt;p&gt;RE: &lt;code&gt;&quot;How do you check an MD5 sum?&quot;&lt;/code&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;See the part about checking the md5 sum in the description above. (About 5 paragraphs down.)
&lt;br /&gt;-Max&lt;/p&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Wed, 06 Aug 2008 22:19:36 +0000</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">userscripts.org:14238:49449</guid>
      <author>Max     (-ElectroFox Designs)</author>
      <link>http://userscripts.org/posts/49449</link>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Archived Comments, replied by Yori</title>
      <description>&lt;p&gt;How do you check an MD5 sum?  I'm not sure, but do we download the MD5 sum from &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.efoxdesigns.com/max/downloads/Screen&quot;&gt;http://www.efoxdesigns.com/max/downloads/Screen&lt;/a&gt; Userscripts/ after we install Screen Userscripts?&lt;/p&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Sat, 14 Jun 2008 03:00:45 +0000</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">userscripts.org:14238:49450</guid>
      <author>Yori</author>
      <link>http://userscripts.org/posts/49450</link>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Archived Comments, replied by bwalker</title>
      <description>&lt;p&gt;I am thankful for this script. People like me who are not experts in javascript can have at least a small level of defense against malicious codes.&lt;/p&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 24 Jan 2008 10:28:29 +0000</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">userscripts.org:14238:49451</guid>
      <author>bwalker</author>
      <link>http://userscripts.org/posts/49451</link>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Archived Comments, replied by Max     (-ElectroFox Designs)</title>
      <description>&lt;p&gt;So, for those of you wondering, there is a bug in the current downloadable version of this script, that I haven't had time to fix yet. Basically, what happens, is that when you upgrade to this version, you will get a message saying that you don't have the current version, when, in fact, you do. All you have to do is click the box, to ignore it forever. (Until, possibly a new version comes out.)
&lt;br /&gt;I might not fix this bug until the next version. However, if people email me, expressing an interest in a fix sooner than that, then I will take a look at it.
&lt;br /&gt;Regards,
&lt;br /&gt;Max          max(AT)efoxdesigns(DOT)com&lt;/p&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Fri, 04 Jan 2008 01:28:56 +0000</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">userscripts.org:14238:49452</guid>
      <author>Max     (-ElectroFox Designs)</author>
      <link>http://userscripts.org/posts/49452</link>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Archived Comments, replied by Daniel Dawson</title>
      <description>&lt;p&gt;I'm with Lucanos on this. It's pretty easy to come up with some convoluted expression that yields &lt;code&gt;&quot;document.cookie&quot;&lt;/code&gt; and then pass it to &lt;code&gt;eval&lt;/code&gt;. It's not that you shouldn't try, but users need to know that there is no guarantee something won't slip through.&lt;/p&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Wed, 12 Sep 2007 23:54:48 +0000</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">userscripts.org:14238:49453</guid>
      <author>Daniel Dawson</author>
      <link>http://userscripts.org/posts/49453</link>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Archived Comments, replied by Lucanos</title>
      <description>&lt;p&gt;An interesting concept - I have had a look at the code (I am no PHP or JavaScript expert, I should point out), but looking for strings which contain &quot;*.php?cookie=*&quot; seems pretty easy to work around - I'd simply change the variable name to &quot;c&quot;, or not bother naming it at all.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;A simpler (and admittedly, possibly easier circumvented) technique may just be to scan for the string &quot;cookie&quot; inside the script.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;Just an idea...&lt;/p&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Tue, 11 Sep 2007 03:24:41 +0000</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">userscripts.org:14238:49454</guid>
      <author>Lucanos</author>
      <link>http://userscripts.org/posts/49454</link>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Archived Comments, replied by shirish</title>
      <description>&lt;p&gt;Very nice, I like it :D&lt;/p&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Tue, 04 Sep 2007 14:42:12 +0000</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">userscripts.org:14238:49455</guid>
      <author>shirish</author>
      <link>http://userscripts.org/posts/49455</link>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Archived Comments, replied by Max     (-ElectroFox Designs)</title>
      <description>&lt;p&gt;Yes, and they do.  Screen Userscripts works on other sites besides us.org, such as this script's &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.efoxdesigns.com/max/downloads/Screen%20Userscripts&quot;&gt;homepage&lt;/a&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;Also, in the future, Screen Userscripts will hopefully be able to screen against other malicious scripts.
&lt;br /&gt;-Max&lt;/p&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 23 Aug 2007 20:26:32 +0000</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">userscripts.org:14238:49456</guid>
      <author>Max     (-ElectroFox Designs)</author>
      <link>http://userscripts.org/posts/49456</link>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Archived Comments, replied by engtech</title>
      <description>&lt;p&gt;If it's possible to scan userscripts for cookie stealing, couldn't us.o do that on their end and flag scripts?&lt;/p&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 23 Aug 2007 19:53:07 +0000</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">userscripts.org:14238:49457</guid>
      <author>engtech</author>
      <link>http://userscripts.org/posts/49457</link>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Archived Comments, replied by granun</title>
      <description>&lt;p&gt;&amp;lt;font&gt;&lt;table&gt;&amp;lt;tbody&gt;&lt;tr&gt;&lt;td&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.prakan.in.th&quot;&gt;&lt;img src=&quot;http://geranun.com/4img/my.jpg&quot; /&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;/td&gt;&lt;td&gt;It's great script&lt;br /&gt;but it's slow down firefox&lt;br /&gt;but it's worth for me to use it,anyway &lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.geranun.com&quot;&gt;.....&lt;strong&gt;Geranun&lt;/strong&gt;......&lt;/a&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;/td&gt;&lt;/tr&gt;&amp;lt;/tbody&gt;&lt;/table&gt;&amp;lt;/font&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/p&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Sun, 19 Aug 2007 09:44:35 +0000</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">userscripts.org:14238:49458</guid>
      <author>granun</author>
      <link>http://userscripts.org/posts/49458</link>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Archived Comments, replied by ithcy</title>
      <description>&lt;p&gt;while this is a valiant effort, the MD5 and SHA1 sums do not provide any additional authenticity verification. if the author of this script were to fall victim to a cookie-stealer script that compromised his USO account, the MD5 and SHA1 sums could be spoofed as easily as this script itself.&lt;/p&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Sun, 19 Aug 2007 05:34:38 +0000</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">userscripts.org:14238:49459</guid>
      <author>ithcy</author>
      <link>http://userscripts.org/posts/49459</link>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Archived Comments, replied by war59312</title>
      <description>&lt;p&gt;Nice one!&lt;/p&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Sat, 18 Aug 2007 20:34:25 +0000</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">userscripts.org:14238:49460</guid>
      <author>war59312</author>
      <link>http://userscripts.org/posts/49460</link>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Archived Comments, replied by Max     (-ElectroFox Designs)</title>
      <description>&lt;p&gt;(By the way, Gasoline, even though the scan button does not appear on the description pages, they are still being scanned.  It's just automatic.)&lt;/p&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 16 Aug 2007 19:49:52 +0000</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">userscripts.org:14238:49461</guid>
      <author>Max     (-ElectroFox Designs)</author>
      <link>http://userscripts.org/posts/49461</link>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Archived Comments, replied by Max     (-ElectroFox Designs)</title>
      <description>&lt;p&gt;Yeah, that's one of the features you can configure.  Just set &lt;code&gt;threshold&lt;/code&gt; to 0, OR set &lt;code&gt;autoScan&lt;/code&gt; to false, if you want it to ask on the description page.  &lt;code&gt;threshold&lt;/code&gt; is the number of script links on a page that Screen Userscripts will automatically scan.  If the number of userscript links on a page is higher than threshold, Screen Userscripts won't auto-scan any, but will show the scan button instead.  If you set &lt;code&gt;autoScan&lt;/code&gt; to false, Screen Userscripts will never automatically scan userscripts, but will display the scan button instead.  (Please see the [Update] notes in the description for release information.)
&lt;br /&gt;Regards,
&lt;br /&gt;-Max&lt;/p&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 16 Aug 2007 17:38:49 +0000</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">userscripts.org:14238:49462</guid>
      <author>Max     (-ElectroFox Designs)</author>
      <link>http://userscripts.org/posts/49462</link>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Archived Comments, replied by Gasoline-</title>
      <description>&lt;p&gt;Ok, the new fetures works, great!&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;but (jea, again :P)
&lt;br /&gt;i think not to scan all scripts on the page, then i go into the script itself, and the &quot;scan-button&quot; disappear.
&lt;br /&gt;(after the search, you got 100 scripts, you show one, to intsall it, but then the button from screen userscript ar gone. you know, the page where you can install scripts with this button.)&lt;/p&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 16 Aug 2007 07:47:30 +0000</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">userscripts.org:14238:49463</guid>
      <author>Gasoline-</author>
      <link>http://userscripts.org/posts/49463</link>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Archived Comments, replied by Max     (-ElectroFox Designs)</title>
      <description>&lt;p&gt;All 'problems' thus far (I'm talking about those in the comments below) have been fixed.
&lt;br /&gt;&lt;code&gt;autoScan&lt;/code&gt; and &lt;code&gt;threshold&lt;/code&gt; options have been added. Enjoy!&lt;/p&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 16 Aug 2007 02:42:21 +0000</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">userscripts.org:14238:49464</guid>
      <author>Max     (-ElectroFox Designs)</author>
      <link>http://userscripts.org/posts/49464</link>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Archived Comments, replied by Max     (-ElectroFox Designs)</title>
      <description>&lt;p&gt;Done.  You now have the option to automatically scan, or be asked.  (Another update is coming soon.)&lt;/p&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Wed, 15 Aug 2007 22:25:00 +0000</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">userscripts.org:14238:49465</guid>
      <author>Max     (-ElectroFox Designs)</author>
      <link>http://userscripts.org/posts/49465</link>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Archived Comments, replied by Tanel</title>
      <description>&lt;p&gt;Same problem here as Gasoline- had - it slows down firefox way to much to use it.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;I am using firefox in ubuntu and it just flashes dark for 5-10 seconds (if not more) - all the browssing (tabs) are also freezed&lt;/p&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Wed, 15 Aug 2007 21:32:34 +0000</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">userscripts.org:14238:49466</guid>
      <author>Tanel</author>
      <link>http://userscripts.org/posts/49466</link>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Archived Comments, replied by Gasoline-</title>
      <description>&lt;p&gt;so, ok. ill testet this script
&lt;br /&gt;it worked on your testpage, nice!&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;buuut:
&lt;br /&gt;if you got e few scripts on a page (eg search on userscripts for scripts) then the script slows down your computer really much (crash firefox).&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;featurerequest:
&lt;br /&gt;build a button, which the user can press to check the actual homepage/script, or just run your script if someone want to install a script.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;i would say, its a featurerequest on greasemonkey addon itselft, they should check the scripts and warn you if the script you will install is malicious. ....&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;(sorry for my bad englisch ;)&lt;/p&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Wed, 15 Aug 2007 12:02:18 +0000</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">userscripts.org:14238:49467</guid>
      <author>Gasoline-</author>
      <link>http://userscripts.org/posts/49467</link>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Archived Comments, replied by crazian</title>
      <description>&lt;p&gt;Let me try it :D&lt;/p&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Tue, 14 Aug 2007 12:01:14 +0000</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">userscripts.org:14238:49468</guid>
      <author>crazian</author>
      <link>http://userscripts.org/posts/49468</link>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Archived Comments, replied by Jesse Andrews</title>
      <description>&lt;p&gt;The following is an archive of comments made before threaded discussions was implemented (November 16th, 2008)&lt;/p&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Wed, 17 Nov 2004 01:05:20 +0000</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">userscripts.org:14238:49447</guid>
      <author>Jesse Andrews</author>
      <link>http://userscripts.org/posts/49447</link>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>
